Carbon emission assessment in asphalt pavement maintenance: A comparative study of five methods

Pavement maintenance significantly contributes to carbon emissions due to its high resource and energy consumption. However, comprehensive assessments of these emissions remain limited. This study systematically evaluates the carbon emissions associated with five common asphalt pavement maintenance strategies. A carbon emission model, developed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, quantifies emissions across three phases: raw material production, transportation and construction. Emission inventories were derived from five practical maintenance project cases and literature. The model effectively predicts emissions in each phase. Results reveal that asphalt is the primary emission source in the raw material production phase for all methods. In the transportation phase, raw material transport, especially aggregate transportation, dominates emissions. During construction, the mixing process, particularly heating, generates the majority of emissions. Total carbon emissions, ranked from highest to lowest, are as follows: milling and resurfacing, ultra-thin wearing course, plant-mixed hot recycling, in-place hot recycling, and micro-surfacing. The raw material production phase has the greatest impact on milling and resurfacing and plant-mixed hot recycling, while emissions from in-place hot recycling and ultra-thin wearing courses are primarily concentrated in the construction phase. Although transportation emissions are significant, they constitute a smaller proportion of total emissions. These findings inform maintenance strategy decisions and suggest emission reduction measures, such as optimizing recycled material production, improving construction techniques, and adopting more efficient transportation methods to mitigate carbon emissions in asphalt pavement maintenance. • LCA model is developed to quantify carbon emissions in pavement maintenance. • Carbon emissions of five maintenance strategies are compared and evaluated. • Asphalt production and mixing/heating are the largest contributors to carbon emissions in maintenance. • Methods using recycled materials significantly lower emissions by reducing virgin material demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e04668
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carbon emission assessment in asphalt pavement maintenance: A comparative study of five methods

Xuze Zhang, Zhifei Tan, Guoyang Lu, Qiwei Chen et al.
1 citations
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
0.95
article

Carbon emission assessment in asphalt pavement maintenance: A comparative study of five methods

Xuze Zhang, Zhifei Tan, Guoyang Lu, Qiwei Chen, Huayang Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Pavement maintenance significantly contributes to carbon emissions due to its high resource and energy consumption. However, comprehensive assessments of these emissions remain limited. This study systematically evaluates the carbon emissions associated with five common asphalt pavement maintenance strategies. A carbon emission model, developed using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, quantifies emissions across three phases: raw material production, transportation and construction. Emission inventories were derived from five practical maintenance project cases and literature. The model effectively predicts emissions in each phase. Results reveal that asphalt is the primary emission source in the raw material production phase for all methods. In the transportation phase, raw material transport, especially aggregate transportation, dominates emissions. During construction, the mixing process, particularly heating, generates the majority of emissions. Total carbon emissions, ranked from highest to lowest, are as follows: milling and resurfacing, ultra-thin wearing course, plant-mixed hot recycling, in-place hot recycling, and micro-surfacing. The raw material production phase has the greatest impact on milling and resurfacing and plant-mixed hot recycling, while emissions from in-place hot recycling and ultra-thin wearing courses are primarily concentrated in the construction phase. Although transportation emissions are significant, they constitute a smaller proportion of total emissions. These findings inform maintenance strategy decisions and suggest emission reduction measures, such as optimizing recycled material production, improving construction techniques, and adopting more efficient transportation methods to mitigate carbon emissions in asphalt pavement maintenance. • LCA model is developed to quantify carbon emissions in pavement maintenance. • Carbon emissions of five maintenance strategies are compared and evaluated. • Asphalt production and mixing/heating are the largest contributors to carbon emissions in maintenance. • Methods using recycled materials significantly lower emissions by reducing virgin material demand.

Case Studies in Construction MaterialsVol. 22
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), City University of Hong Kong (HK), Shenzhen Polytechnic University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.