Evaluation of physical and processing quality traits among different chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes

The present study evaluates the variability in physical and processing quality characteristics among fifteen chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes/varieties, namely: K-3256, KWR-108, KGD-1145, KPG-59, KGD-1250, Avrodhi, Radhey, KGD-1918, KGD-93, IPC-71, IPC-310, GNG-2144, GNG-2171, KGD-2011, and KGD-1913. These genotypes were sourced from the Legume Breeding Program, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSAUAT, Kanpur.Significant variability was observed in several physical and processing traits, including dhal recovery (71.45-82.62%), husk recovery (7.50-17.75%), broken dhal percentage (2.00-5.61%), processing losses (1.87-9.46%), test weight (9.45-28.84 g), grain yield (11-26 q/ha), moisture content (67-120), number of pods per plant, and maturity period (118-134 days).Among the genotypes, KGD-1250 excelled in two key physical traits: test weight and number of pods per plant. KGD-1913 demonstrated the highest grain yield (26 q/ha), while KGD-2011 exhibited superior performance in processing traits, including maximum dhal recovery and minimum processing loss. These findings highlight the potential of specific genotypes for targeted breeding and commercial processing applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i4f.4134
Primary Topic
Agricultural pest management studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of physical and processing quality traits among different chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes

Vikas Gautam, Anuj K. Yadav, Nand Kumar, Ravi Dixit et al.
International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research
Agricultural pest management studies
article

Evaluation of physical and processing quality traits among different chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes

Vikas Gautam, Anuj K. Yadav, Nand Kumar, Ravi Dixit, Madastu Saikrishna
article en

Abstract

The present study evaluates the variability in physical and processing quality characteristics among fifteen chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes/varieties, namely: K-3256, KWR-108, KGD-1145, KPG-59, KGD-1250, Avrodhi, Radhey, KGD-1918, KGD-93, IPC-71, IPC-310, GNG-2144, GNG-2171, KGD-2011, and KGD-1913. These genotypes were sourced from the Legume Breeding Program, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSAUAT, Kanpur.Significant variability was observed in several physical and processing traits, including dhal recovery (71.45-82.62%), husk recovery (7.50-17.75%), broken dhal percentage (2.00-5.61%), processing losses (1.87-9.46%), test weight (9.45-28.84 g), grain yield (11-26 q/ha), moisture content (67-120), number of pods per plant, and maturity period (118-134 days).Among the genotypes, KGD-1250 excelled in two key physical traits: test weight and number of pods per plant. KGD-1913 demonstrated the highest grain yield (26 q/ha), while KGD-2011 exhibited superior performance in processing traits, including maximum dhal recovery and minimum processing loss. These findings highlight the potential of specific genotypes for targeted breeding and commercial processing applications.

International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry ResearchVol. 9(4)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Agricultural pest management studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of physical and processing quality traits among different chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes — Vikas Gautam, Anuj K. Yadav, et al. · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS