P(doom) Versus AI Optimism: Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and the Factors That Shape Them

Abstract Since the public release of ChatGPT in 2022, fears about the large-scale impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) have been on the rise. Extreme negative attitudes toward AI have been dubbed “p(doom),” or the probability that AI will take over the world. Despite news stories highlighting the most extreme views about AI’s impacts, it remains unclear whether the general population holds such views. Do people believe that AI is very bad, that AI will take over the world, or that AI will replace people? How prevalent are these worries, and what factors influence fears and hopes about these new AI technologies? In this study, we investigated perceptions and attitudes toward AI’s impact on the self and on society in the USA. We studied how those perceptions and attitudes were affected by a brief exposure to a popular conversational chatbot. We also studied how perceptions of AI related to individual differences in Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI), personality traits, social and mental health, and demographics. Our results suggest that most people disagree with p(doom) sentiments and instead hold more optimistic views toward AI. Further, people with higher reported social health, high Agreeableness, less Neuroticism, less Loneliness, and more familiarity with technology as measured by ATI tended to have more favorable views toward AI’s large-scale impact. Our findings shed light on the current state of the US public’s fears and perceptions of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-025-00512-3
Citations
3
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P(doom) Versus AI Optimism: Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and the Factors That Shape Them

Michael S. A. Graziano, Rose E. Guingrich
3 citations
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
article

P(doom) Versus AI Optimism: Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and the Factors That Shape Them

Michael S. A. Graziano, Rose E. Guingrich
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Since the public release of ChatGPT in 2022, fears about the large-scale impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) have been on the rise. Extreme negative attitudes toward AI have been dubbed “p(doom),” or the probability that AI will take over the world. Despite news stories highlighting the most extreme views about AI’s impacts, it remains unclear whether the general population holds such views. Do people believe that AI is very bad, that AI will take over the world, or that AI will replace people? How prevalent are these worries, and what factors influence fears and hopes about these new AI technologies? In this study, we investigated perceptions and attitudes toward AI’s impact on the self and on society in the USA. We studied how those perceptions and attitudes were affected by a brief exposure to a popular conversational chatbot. We also studied how perceptions of AI related to individual differences in Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI), personality traits, social and mental health, and demographics. Our results suggest that most people disagree with p(doom) sentiments and instead hold more optimistic views toward AI. Further, people with higher reported social health, high Agreeableness, less Neuroticism, less Loneliness, and more familiarity with technology as measured by ATI tended to have more favorable views toward AI’s large-scale impact. Our findings shed light on the current state of the US public’s fears and perceptions of AI.

Journal of Technology in Behavioral ScienceVol. 10(4)
Princeton University (US), Princeton Public Schools (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI in Service Interactions
7.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.