A Quantitative Classification of the Geography of Non‐Native Flora in the United States

ABSTRACT Aim Non‐native plants have the potential to harm ecosystems. Harm is classically related to their distribution and abundance, but this geographical information is often unknown. Here, we assess geographical commonness as a potential indicator of invasive status for non‐native flora in the United States. Geographical commonness could inform invasion risk assessments across species and ecoregions. Location Conterminous United States. Time Period Through 2022. Major Taxa Studied Plants. Methods We compiled and standardised occurrence and abundance data from 14 spatial datasets and used this information to categorise non‐native species as uncommon or common based on three dimensions of commonness: area of occupancy, habitat breadth and local abundance. To assess consistency in existing categorizations, we compared commonness to invasive status in the United States. We identified species with higher‐than‐expected abundance relative to their occupancy, habitat breadth or residence time. We calculated non‐native plant richness within United States ecoregions and estimated unreported species based on rarefaction/extrapolation curves. Results This comprehensive database identified 1874 non‐native plant species recorded in 4,844,963 locations. Of these, 1221 species were locally abundant (> 10% cover) in 797,759 unique locations. One thousand one hundred one non‐native species (59%) achieved at least one dimension of commonness, including 565 species that achieved all three. Species with longer residence times tended to meet more dimensions of commonness. We identified 132 species with higher‐than‐expected abundance. Ecoregions in the central United States have the largest estimated numbers of unreported, abundant non‐native plants. Main Conclusions A high proportion of non‐native species have become common in the United States. However, existing categorizations of invasive species are not always consistent with species' abundance and distribution, even after considering residence time. Considering geographical commonness and higher‐than‐expected abundance revealed in this new dataset could support more consistent and proactive identification of invasive plants and lead to more efficient management practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70041
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Quantitative Classification of the Geography of Non‐Native Flora in the United States

Montserrat Vilà, Cascade J. B. Sorte, Bethany A. Bradley, Regan Early et al.
1 citations
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
1.75
article

A Quantitative Classification of the Geography of Non‐Native Flora in the United States

Montserrat Vilà, Cascade J. B. Sorte, Bethany A. Bradley, Regan Early, Annette E. Evans, David T. Barnett, Evelyn M. Beaury, Jeffrey S. Dukes, Jeffrey D. Corbin, Helen R. Sofaer, Ian S. Pearse, Inés Ibáñez, Dana M. Blumenthal, Laís Petri
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Non‐native plants have the potential to harm ecosystems. Harm is classically related to their distribution and abundance, but this geographical information is often unknown. Here, we assess geographical commonness as a potential indicator of invasive status for non‐native flora in the United States. Geographical commonness could inform invasion risk assessments across species and ecoregions. Location Conterminous United States. Time Period Through 2022. Major Taxa Studied Plants. Methods We compiled and standardised occurrence and abundance data from 14 spatial datasets and used this information to categorise non‐native species as uncommon or common based on three dimensions of commonness: area of occupancy, habitat breadth and local abundance. To assess consistency in existing categorizations, we compared commonness to invasive status in the United States. We identified species with higher‐than‐expected abundance relative to their occupancy, habitat breadth or residence time. We calculated non‐native plant richness within United States ecoregions and estimated unreported species based on rarefaction/extrapolation curves. Results This comprehensive database identified 1874 non‐native plant species recorded in 4,844,963 locations. Of these, 1221 species were locally abundant (> 10% cover) in 797,759 unique locations. One thousand one hundred one non‐native species (59%) achieved at least one dimension of commonness, including 565 species that achieved all three. Species with longer residence times tended to meet more dimensions of commonness. We identified 132 species with higher‐than‐expected abundance. Ecoregions in the central United States have the largest estimated numbers of unreported, abundant non‐native plants. Main Conclusions A high proportion of non‐native species have become common in the United States. However, existing categorizations of invasive species are not always consistent with species' abundance and distribution, even after considering residence time. Considering geographical commonness and higher‐than‐expected abundance revealed in this new dataset could support more consistent and proactive identification of invasive plants and lead to more efficient management practices.

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 34(4)
United States Geological Survey (US), Union College (US), University of Saint Joseph (US), Carnegie Institution for Science (US), University of California, Irvine (US), University of Exeter (GB), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University of Michigan (US), New York Botanical Garden (US), National Ecological Observatory Network (US), Estación Biológica de Doñana (ES), Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center (US), Agricultural Research Service - Plains Area (US), Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Fort Collins Science Center, Hartford Financial Services (United States), Universidad de Sevilla (ES), Michigan State University (US)
U.S. Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.