Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial <sup>123</sup> I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake

In this study, we aimed to clarify the utility of the myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) method in myocardial<sup>123</sup>I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy by evaluating the impact of lung and liver uptake changes on both the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) and myocardial SUV. The Monte Carlo simulation code simulating medical imaging nuclear detectors was used to simulate the imaging of a myocardial phantom HL under the assumption of normal uptake in myocardial MIBG scintigraphy. In addition, imaging of multiple myocardial phantom HLs with different lung and liver uptake concentrations was simulated. Quantitative values for the myocardial SUV and H/M ratio were calculated from the simulated data of the digital myocardial phantom HL. The effects of lung and liver uptake variation were evaluated by assessing the relative standard deviation (RSD) of each calculated value. For lung uptake variations, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.34% for the maximum count and 1.64% for the mean count, whereas the RSD of the H/M ratio was 4.73%. For variations in liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.73% for the maximum count and 0.72% for the mean count, with the RSD of the H/M ratio being 0.02%. After removing the segments clearly influenced by liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 0.007% for the maximum value and 0.004% for the mean value, which were both smaller than the RSD of the H/M ratio. These findings indicate that the myocardial SUV method allows for a quantitative evaluation that is less influenced by lung and liver uptake compared with the H/M ratio, thereby enabling a more stable assessment of myocardial uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adccc9
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake

Yoshiaki Yasumoto, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Mitsuru Sato
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake

Yoshiaki Yasumoto, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Mitsuru Sato
article en

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to clarify the utility of the myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) method in myocardial<sup>123</sup>I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy by evaluating the impact of lung and liver uptake changes on both the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) and myocardial SUV. The Monte Carlo simulation code simulating medical imaging nuclear detectors was used to simulate the imaging of a myocardial phantom HL under the assumption of normal uptake in myocardial MIBG scintigraphy. In addition, imaging of multiple myocardial phantom HLs with different lung and liver uptake concentrations was simulated. Quantitative values for the myocardial SUV and H/M ratio were calculated from the simulated data of the digital myocardial phantom HL. The effects of lung and liver uptake variation were evaluated by assessing the relative standard deviation (RSD) of each calculated value. For lung uptake variations, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.34% for the maximum count and 1.64% for the mean count, whereas the RSD of the H/M ratio was 4.73%. For variations in liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.73% for the maximum count and 0.72% for the mean count, with the RSD of the H/M ratio being 0.02%. After removing the segments clearly influenced by liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 0.007% for the maximum value and 0.004% for the mean value, which were both smaller than the RSD of the H/M ratio. These findings indicate that the myocardial SUV method allows for a quantitative evaluation that is less influenced by lung and liver uptake compared with the H/M ratio, thereby enabling a more stable assessment of myocardial uptake.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 11(3)
Saitama Prefecture (JP), Saitama Municipal Hospital (JP), Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.