Ten Years of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: The Critical Assessment and Future Directions

This paper looks at how China’s use of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in its policy towards Central Asia (CA) has changed since 2013 and what this change signalizes regarding China’s use of the BRI at international forums. To answer these research questions, the paper focuses on Central Asia – once dubbed “the first strand of the BRI” (R. Pantucci); the region where China has “tested” many institutions of its international engagement; and where the BRI was introduced in 2013. To answer the research questions, this study draws from analyzing literature and sources in Russian, Chinese, English, and Polish. This study is primarily empirically oriented. This study finds that at its 10, the BRI will focus on connectivity, clean energy, and new technologies. It also finds that despite the high profile of the Green BRI and many relevant agreements, only a fraction of projects are branded “Green BRI.” It thus argues that the BRI has served as a legitimizing “umbrella” label for various Chinese policy initiatives, which are realized via other cooperation formats.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polish Political Science Yearbook
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppsy202505
Primary Topic
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ten Years of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: The Critical Assessment and Future Directions

Elżbieta Proń
Polish Political Science Yearbook
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
article

Ten Years of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: The Critical Assessment and Future Directions

Elżbieta Proń
article en

Abstract

This paper looks at how China’s use of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in its policy towards Central Asia (CA) has changed since 2013 and what this change signalizes regarding China’s use of the BRI at international forums. To answer these research questions, the paper focuses on Central Asia – once dubbed “the first strand of the BRI” (R. Pantucci); the region where China has “tested” many institutions of its international engagement; and where the BRI was introduced in 2013. To answer the research questions, this study draws from analyzing literature and sources in Russian, Chinese, English, and Polish. This study is primarily empirically oriented. This study finds that at its 10, the BRI will focus on connectivity, clean energy, and new technologies. It also finds that despite the high profile of the Green BRI and many relevant agreements, only a fraction of projects are branded “Green BRI.” It thus argues that the BRI has served as a legitimizing “umbrella” label for various Chinese policy initiatives, which are realized via other cooperation formats.

Polish Political Science YearbookVol. Volume 54 (2025)(Issue 1)
University of Silesia in Katowice (PL)
Harvard University, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Harvard University
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ten Years of China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: The Critical Assessment and Future Directions — Elżbieta Proń · Polish Political Science Yearbook (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS