Psychological Pathways for Sustainable Relationships: Transcendent Emotion, Animistic Belief, and Moral Reasoning Within an Embodied Ecology

This scoping review outlines psychological pathways that foster attunement with self, others, and the planet in service of a future composed of more sustainable relationships. Shifts in the social and sustainability sciences represent a relational turn, one that focuses on the interconnectedness of the human and more-than-human earth. In this review, we explore how psychologists can deepen their relational and ecological orientations by attending to the interdisciplinary work that has been done and still needs doing, all in service of personal, interpersonal, and planetary health. Sustainable relationships maintain mutuality, balance, and harmony, minimize harm, and maximize equity, in ways that are viable and persist over time. In this paper, we explore a psychological framework for sustainable relationships through the lens of embodied ecology—a perspective that foregrounds relations instead of bounded entities. Embodied ecology encompasses and transcends ontology and epistemology, where individual and wider relations are in a constant state of motion: being and becoming mutually interdependent. We examine three psychological dimensions of sustainable relationships through the lens of embodied ecology: (1) transcendent moral emotions (2) relational animistic beliefs, and (3) relational moral reasoning. This scoping review provides a conceptual map of psychology’s role in understanding sustainable relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of General Psychology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680251335607
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Pathways for Sustainable Relationships: Transcendent Emotion, Animistic Belief, and Moral Reasoning Within an Embodied Ecology

Jolina H. Ruckert, Sarah Smith, Haley Kramer
1 citations
Review of General Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
article

Psychological Pathways for Sustainable Relationships: Transcendent Emotion, Animistic Belief, and Moral Reasoning Within an Embodied Ecology

Jolina H. Ruckert, Sarah Smith, Haley Kramer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This scoping review outlines psychological pathways that foster attunement with self, others, and the planet in service of a future composed of more sustainable relationships. Shifts in the social and sustainability sciences represent a relational turn, one that focuses on the interconnectedness of the human and more-than-human earth. In this review, we explore how psychologists can deepen their relational and ecological orientations by attending to the interdisciplinary work that has been done and still needs doing, all in service of personal, interpersonal, and planetary health. Sustainable relationships maintain mutuality, balance, and harmony, minimize harm, and maximize equity, in ways that are viable and persist over time. In this paper, we explore a psychological framework for sustainable relationships through the lens of embodied ecology—a perspective that foregrounds relations instead of bounded entities. Embodied ecology encompasses and transcends ontology and epistemology, where individual and wider relations are in a constant state of motion: being and becoming mutually interdependent. We examine three psychological dimensions of sustainable relationships through the lens of embodied ecology: (1) transcendent moral emotions (2) relational animistic beliefs, and (3) relational moral reasoning. This scoping review provides a conceptual map of psychology’s role in understanding sustainable relationships.

Review of General PsychologyVol. 29(4)
Lewis & Clark College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.