Effectiveness of simultaneous manipulation by the upper and lower limbs in a planar 2-DOF reaching task

A person capable of using more than one of four limbs simultaneously for manipulation can also be expected to be capable of performing concurrent and complex tasks and improving work efficiency. However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated simultaneous tasks that require multi-degree-of-freedom manipulation, particularly those in which the lower limb engages in the same task as the upper limb. In this study, we developed a system to evaluate work performance and subjective mental workload using reaching movements with multiple limbs. To foster comparisons among various manipulations, experiments were conducted with single manipulation by a hand or a foot, simultaneous manipulation by the homologous limbs (left-hand_right-hand, left-foot_right-foot), simultaneous manipulation by the ipsilateral heterologous limbs (left-hand_left-foot, right-hand_right-foot), and simultaneous manipulation by the contralateral heterologous limbs (left-hand_right-foot, right-hand_left-foot). The processing time and accuracy of each limb were lower during two-than one-limb manipulation. In other words, a bilateral deficit tended to be seen. When manipulating with two limbs, manipulation with the homologous limbs was significantly superior to that with the heterologous limbs in terms of processing time, accuracy, and mental workload. Because the work performance of a foot tended to be worse than that of a hand in the one-limb manipulation, the work performance of the two-limb manipulation using both feet was expected to be the worst in the two-limb manipulations. However, the experimental results showed that the work performance of the heterologous limbs was worse than that of both feet. Manipulation with the contralateral heterologous limbs tended to be superior to that with the ipsilateral heterologous limbs in terms of processing time, accuracy, and mental workload. Regarding two-limb manipulation, the homologous limbs tended to perform best, followed by the contralateral and ipsilateral heterologous limbs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mechanical Engineering Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.24-00218
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of simultaneous manipulation by the upper and lower limbs in a planar 2-DOF reaching task

Yusuke Watabe, Masaharu KOMORI, Tatsuro Terakawa, Michio Nomura et al.
1 citations
Mechanical Engineering Journal
Motor Control and Adaptation
1.43
article

Effectiveness of simultaneous manipulation by the upper and lower limbs in a planar 2-DOF reaching task

Yusuke Watabe, Masaharu KOMORI, Tatsuro Terakawa, Michio Nomura, Yukihiko MAMIYA
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A person capable of using more than one of four limbs simultaneously for manipulation can also be expected to be capable of performing concurrent and complex tasks and improving work efficiency. However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated simultaneous tasks that require multi-degree-of-freedom manipulation, particularly those in which the lower limb engages in the same task as the upper limb. In this study, we developed a system to evaluate work performance and subjective mental workload using reaching movements with multiple limbs. To foster comparisons among various manipulations, experiments were conducted with single manipulation by a hand or a foot, simultaneous manipulation by the homologous limbs (left-hand_right-hand, left-foot_right-foot), simultaneous manipulation by the ipsilateral heterologous limbs (left-hand_left-foot, right-hand_right-foot), and simultaneous manipulation by the contralateral heterologous limbs (left-hand_right-foot, right-hand_left-foot). The processing time and accuracy of each limb were lower during two-than one-limb manipulation. In other words, a bilateral deficit tended to be seen. When manipulating with two limbs, manipulation with the homologous limbs was significantly superior to that with the heterologous limbs in terms of processing time, accuracy, and mental workload. Because the work performance of a foot tended to be worse than that of a hand in the one-limb manipulation, the work performance of the two-limb manipulation using both feet was expected to be the worst in the two-limb manipulations. However, the experimental results showed that the work performance of the heterologous limbs was worse than that of both feet. Manipulation with the contralateral heterologous limbs tended to be superior to that with the ipsilateral heterologous limbs in terms of processing time, accuracy, and mental workload. Regarding two-limb manipulation, the homologous limbs tended to perform best, followed by the contralateral and ipsilateral heterologous limbs.

Mechanical Engineering JournalVol. 12(3)
Kyoto University (JP), Kyoto University of Education (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Motor Control and Adaptation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.