A Delphi Consensus on Recommendations for Improving Research Processes and Infrastructure to Address Health Disparities

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic disparities in critical care medicine remain poorly understood, making them difficult to address.This initiative developed a thought leader consensus with recommendations for critical care research to document, assess, and understand potential disparities.RESEARCH QUESTION: What key areas should future critical care research focus on to better identify and address disparities related to race, ethnicity, and language?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A modified Delphi-based method was used to form a consensus about addressing racial disparities through future critical care research.Nine thought leaders discussed aspects related to 4 topics: collection of race, ethnicity, and language variables; establishing recruitment plans for researchers from racial and ethnic minority groups; designating minority serving institutions; and health disparity education and community engagement.Consensus was reached when $ 80% of members agreed (answered with yes or with 4 to 5 points on a Likert scale). RESULTS:Thought leaders arrived at a consensus agreement (100%) that improved data quality, achieved by more robust recruitment of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups and standardization of race and ethnicity data, is crucial as the initial step of uncovering health disparities.They agreed that collection of language preferences should be part of all research studies to expose potential biases and disparities in non-English speakers (100% agreement).Engagement of racial and ethnic minority communities was agreed to be essential to obtain involvement of research participants from such minoritized groups (100%).INTERPRETATION: This consensus revealed the notable data deficiency impacting health disparities within critical care research especially when compared with other settings, highlighting the crucial need for comprehensive focus on this domain.Standardization of race, ethnicity, and language data collection, with the goal of increasing the number of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups, is vital for understanding health disparities in critical care research and its potential causes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Critical Care
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chstcc.2025.100160
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Delphi Consensus on Recommendations for Improving Research Processes and Infrastructure to Address Health Disparities

Jen‐Ting Chen, Florian Mayr, Nadia Ferguson-Myrthil, Ayodeji Adegunsoye et al.
1 citations
CHEST Critical Care
Delphi Technique in Research
4.20
article

A Delphi Consensus on Recommendations for Improving Research Processes and Infrastructure to Address Health Disparities

Jen‐Ting Chen, Florian Mayr, Nadia Ferguson-Myrthil, Ayodeji Adegunsoye, Devora Winkfield, Thomas S. Valley, B. Corbett Walsh, I. Hassan, Mari Armstrong-Hough, A. Mohamed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic disparities in critical care medicine remain poorly understood, making them difficult to address.This initiative developed a thought leader consensus with recommendations for critical care research to document, assess, and understand potential disparities.RESEARCH QUESTION: What key areas should future critical care research focus on to better identify and address disparities related to race, ethnicity, and language?STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A modified Delphi-based method was used to form a consensus about addressing racial disparities through future critical care research.Nine thought leaders discussed aspects related to 4 topics: collection of race, ethnicity, and language variables; establishing recruitment plans for researchers from racial and ethnic minority groups; designating minority serving institutions; and health disparity education and community engagement.Consensus was reached when $ 80% of members agreed (answered with yes or with 4 to 5 points on a Likert scale). RESULTS:Thought leaders arrived at a consensus agreement (100%) that improved data quality, achieved by more robust recruitment of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups and standardization of race and ethnicity data, is crucial as the initial step of uncovering health disparities.They agreed that collection of language preferences should be part of all research studies to expose potential biases and disparities in non-English speakers (100% agreement).Engagement of racial and ethnic minority communities was agreed to be essential to obtain involvement of research participants from such minoritized groups (100%).INTERPRETATION: This consensus revealed the notable data deficiency impacting health disparities within critical care research especially when compared with other settings, highlighting the crucial need for comprehensive focus on this domain.Standardization of race, ethnicity, and language data collection, with the goal of increasing the number of research participants from racial and ethnic minority groups, is vital for understanding health disparities in critical care research and its potential causes.

CHEST Critical CareVol. 3(3)
Montefiore Medical Center (US), Howard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California System (US), University of Chicago (US), VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US), VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System (US), New York University (US)
National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Genentech, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Delphi Technique in Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.