Next‐generation sequencing sheds new light on a major lineage of Acanthaceae, clarifying previously uncertain relationships in Barlerieae

Abstract The Acanthaceae tribe Barlerieae is an understudied lineage that consists of ca. 500 species, many of which are rare and range restricted. Though understudied, it is clear that many species play vital roles in tropical ecosystems, including supporting a wide range of pollinators and herbivores. The tribe contains 13 genera, the two largest and most widespread of which are the primarily Paleotropical Barleria (ca. 300 spp.) and pantropical Lepidagathis (ca. 150 spp.). In a recent reclassification of Acanthaceae, three subtribes were informally proposed based on corolla and calyx characters: (1) Barleria , (2) Crabbea and allies, and (3) Lepidagathis and allies. Using a next‐generation sequencing approach, double‐digest restriction associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq), this study estimates a well‐sampled phylogeny of the Barlerieae tribe, tests genera and infrageneric groups for monophyly, and identifies morphological characters that support monophyletic groups. Our study reveals strong support for the monophyly of Barlerieae and resolves relationships among all 13 genera currently recognized in the tribe. There is strong support for the three proposed subtribes. Our results also suggest that taxonomic revision of Lepidagathis is necessary. Species of Lepidagathis are found in three clades: (A) Lepidagathis s.str., (B) Lophostachys s.l., and (C) Teliostachya , each of which can be distinguished by inflorescence and stamen characters. The phylogenetic relationships recovered here indicate that each of the three clades should be classified as a separate genus. This research lays the groundwork for future taxonomic revisionary work as well as the construction of updated identification keys that will aid in conservation efforts and provide insight into the evolutionary processes that shape biodiversity in this remarkable lineage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taxon
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13341
Primary Topic
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Next‐generation sequencing sheds new light on a major lineage of Acanthaceae, clarifying previously uncertain relationships in Barlerieae

Lucinda A. McDade, Robert Comito, Iain Darbyshire, Carrie A. Kiel
Taxon
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
article

Next‐generation sequencing sheds new light on a major lineage of Acanthaceae, clarifying previously uncertain relationships in Barlerieae

Lucinda A. McDade, Robert Comito, Iain Darbyshire, Carrie A. Kiel
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Acanthaceae tribe Barlerieae is an understudied lineage that consists of ca. 500 species, many of which are rare and range restricted. Though understudied, it is clear that many species play vital roles in tropical ecosystems, including supporting a wide range of pollinators and herbivores. The tribe contains 13 genera, the two largest and most widespread of which are the primarily Paleotropical Barleria (ca. 300 spp.) and pantropical Lepidagathis (ca. 150 spp.). In a recent reclassification of Acanthaceae, three subtribes were informally proposed based on corolla and calyx characters: (1) Barleria , (2) Crabbea and allies, and (3) Lepidagathis and allies. Using a next‐generation sequencing approach, double‐digest restriction associated DNA sequencing (ddRADseq), this study estimates a well‐sampled phylogeny of the Barlerieae tribe, tests genera and infrageneric groups for monophyly, and identifies morphological characters that support monophyletic groups. Our study reveals strong support for the monophyly of Barlerieae and resolves relationships among all 13 genera currently recognized in the tribe. There is strong support for the three proposed subtribes. Our results also suggest that taxonomic revision of Lepidagathis is necessary. Species of Lepidagathis are found in three clades: (A) Lepidagathis s.str., (B) Lophostachys s.l., and (C) Teliostachya , each of which can be distinguished by inflorescence and stamen characters. The phylogenetic relationships recovered here indicate that each of the three clades should be classified as a separate genus. This research lays the groundwork for future taxonomic revisionary work as well as the construction of updated identification keys that will aid in conservation efforts and provide insight into the evolutionary processes that shape biodiversity in this remarkable lineage.

TaxonVol. 74(4)
Scripps College (US), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.