A right frontal network for analogical and deductive reasoning
Two of the most well-studied types of reasoning are analogical reasoning (AR) and deductive reasoning (DR). Yet, our understanding of the relationship between reasoning abilities and their neuroanatomical basis remains surprisingly limited. We aimed to conduct fine-grained anatomical mapping of performance on tests of AR, DR and fluid intelligence (Gf), in a large sample of patients with unilateral focal frontal or posterior lesions and healthy controls. We assessed 247 prospectively recruited patients using two new tests: the Analogical Reasoning Test (ART) and the Deductive Reasoning Test (DRT); and the best-established measure of Gf: Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM). Non-parametric Bayesian stochastic block modelling was used to reveal the community structure of lesion deficit networks, disentangling functional from confounding pathological distributed effects. ART and DRT performance was significantly impaired in patients with frontal lesions [ART: F(2,238) = 18.93; P < 0.001; Frontal group worse than Posterior group and healthy controls, both P < 0.001; DRT: F(2,387) = 18.491; P < 0.001; Frontal group worse than healthy controls, P < 0.01]. Right frontal effects were evident on both tests. Thus, on the ART, right frontal patients were more impaired than left (P < 0.05). On the DRT, right frontal patients were more impaired than left frontal patients on questions with indeterminate solutions (P < 0.05) but not on questions with determinate ones. Non-parametric Bayesian stochastic block modelling implicated a right frontal network in ART and DRT performance. Strikingly, we found that this network was also implicated in performance on RAPM. Our study represents the most robust investigation of AR and DR in the focally injured brain. Our findings imply that a right frontal network is critical. The ART and DRT appear to be promising new clinical tests, capable of evaluating reasoning abilities and identifying right frontal lobe dysfunction.
Authors
- Parashkev Nachev (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-4423)
- Lisa Cipolotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5838-3647)
- Edgar Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-683X)
- James K. Ruffle (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6248-7203)
- J Mole (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0092-1128)
- Amy Nelson
- Tim Shallice
Institutions
- Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (IT)
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Brain
- Published
- 2025-04-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf062
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.86
Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
- National Brain Appeal
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Guarantors of Brain
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Medical Research Council