Coordinating National Responses to Serious CrossBorder Threats to Health in the European Union: European Health Union and beyond

The project of the European Health Union ('EHU'), a direct response to experience gained from the Covid-19 pandemic, has adapted the institutional, and legal design of the European Union ('EU') in order to permit the EU to react to serious cross-border threats to health in a more uniform and efficient way. While the EHU has brought about important shifts, certain gaps or weaknesses in the coordination of national responses to serious cross-border threats to health can, however, be identified even with the EHU and merit further discussion. This discussion should also encompass the issue of revisiting the separation of competences between the EU and the Member States in the area of combating serious cross-border threats to health because the existing model of the separation of competences in this area continues to impose important limits on the coordination of national responses to serious cross-border threats to health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Administrative Law
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7590/187479825x17412660273109
Primary Topic
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coordinating National Responses to Serious CrossBorder Threats to Health in the European Union: European Health Union and beyond

Jana Mali, Magdaléna Svobodová
Review of European Administrative Law
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
article

Coordinating National Responses to Serious CrossBorder Threats to Health in the European Union: European Health Union and beyond

Jana Mali, Magdaléna Svobodová
article en

Abstract

The project of the European Health Union ('EHU'), a direct response to experience gained from the Covid-19 pandemic, has adapted the institutional, and legal design of the European Union ('EU') in order to permit the EU to react to serious cross-border threats to health in a more uniform and efficient way. While the EHU has brought about important shifts, certain gaps or weaknesses in the coordination of national responses to serious cross-border threats to health can, however, be identified even with the EHU and merit further discussion. This discussion should also encompass the issue of revisiting the separation of competences between the EU and the Member States in the area of combating serious cross-border threats to health because the existing model of the separation of competences in this area continues to impose important limits on the coordination of national responses to serious cross-border threats to health.

Review of European Administrative LawVol. 18(1)
Charles University (CZ), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of State and Law (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.