A multi‐institutional multi‐methods analysis of jeopardy systems in academic hospital medicine
Jeopardy systems are essential for hospital medicine staffing but contribute to clinician dissatisfaction due to unpredictability and perceived inequities in coverage. Implementing deliberate scheduling, formalized support for absences, and equitable compensation models may reduce dissatisfaction and improve jeopardy system sustainability.
Authors
- Angela Keniston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1399-2881)
- Matthew Sakumoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-471X)
- Marisha Burden (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-3994)
- Shradha A. Kulkarni
- Anne S. Linker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-5065)
- Gopi J. Astik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-3243)
- Andrew David Auerbach (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-0527)
- Gregory Bowling
- Luci K. Leykum (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0042-5458)
- Jeffrey L. Schnipper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7072-0781)
- Kirsten N. Kangelaris (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-994X)
Institutions
- Northwestern University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- University of Colorado Hospital (US)
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Hospital Medicine
- Published
- 2025-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70045
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.25