The Precolonial Origins of African Nationalism

What explains the degree of national attachment expressed by contemporary Africans? Using historical data on early African statehood and survey responses from across the continent, I show that national identification among contemporary Africans was jointly shaped by the socialization efforts of precolonial rulers and the form of colonial rule employed by European administrators. In areas where precolonial rulers socialized their subjects to a common identity and colonial bureaucrats subsequently ruled through ethnic intermediaries, ethnic allegiance still trumps national identity because ethnic institutions continue to mediate the relationship between local communities and the state. In contrast, where policies of direct rule displaced precolonial rulers and formerly centralized groups lost political autonomy, the legacy of early statehood frequently produced the opposite outcome: interethnic cohesion. Departing from classical explanations that emphasize (post)colonial experiences, the findings advance our understanding of contemporary African nationalism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140251328030
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Precolonial Origins of African Nationalism

Vladimir Chlouba
1 citations
Comparative Political Studies
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
5.59
article

The Precolonial Origins of African Nationalism

Vladimir Chlouba
article en
1 citations

Abstract

What explains the degree of national attachment expressed by contemporary Africans? Using historical data on early African statehood and survey responses from across the continent, I show that national identification among contemporary Africans was jointly shaped by the socialization efforts of precolonial rulers and the form of colonial rule employed by European administrators. In areas where precolonial rulers socialized their subjects to a common identity and colonial bureaucrats subsequently ruled through ethnic intermediaries, ethnic allegiance still trumps national identity because ethnic institutions continue to mediate the relationship between local communities and the state. In contrast, where policies of direct rule displaced precolonial rulers and formerly centralized groups lost political autonomy, the legacy of early statehood frequently produced the opposite outcome: interethnic cohesion. Departing from classical explanations that emphasize (post)colonial experiences, the findings advance our understanding of contemporary African nationalism.

Comparative Political StudiesVol. 59(2)
University of Richmond (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
5.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.