Iran’s Palestinian Policy after Hamas’ 7 October Attack

This study examines Iran's Palestine policy after Hamas' 7 October attack on Israel. Firstly, Iran's Resistance paradigm, which expresses Iran's opposition to the US and Israel, and its Palestine policy are discussed through the ontological security approach. In this context, it is stated that after the 1979 Revolution, Iran adopted policies such as support for the Palestinian cause and anti-Israelism as a normative obligation and an identity belonging. The 7 October attack, on the other hand, was a critical turning point for Iran, which reinforced its anti-Israel stance but revealed its limited capacity to effectively support the Palestinian cause. The study argues that after the 7 October attack, despite Iran's support for Hamas and the broader Axis of Resistance, its actions were strategically measured and it pursued a policy of controlled tension that sought to limit the conflict. This is mainly due to the fact that Iran lacks the material capacity to meet its normative obligations. In this context, through discourse and content analyses of official statements, media sources and speeches, the increasing tension between Iran's normative obligations and material realities has been revealed. On the other hand, it has been argued that Israel's policy of escalation has put Iran's policy of controlled tension into difficulty, and this situation has brought new threats and challenges for both Iran and Israel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1567000
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iran’s Palestinian Policy after Hamas’ 7 October Attack

Murat Cingöz
1 citations
MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
article

Iran’s Palestinian Policy after Hamas’ 7 October Attack

Murat Cingöz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines Iran's Palestine policy after Hamas' 7 October attack on Israel. Firstly, Iran's Resistance paradigm, which expresses Iran's opposition to the US and Israel, and its Palestine policy are discussed through the ontological security approach. In this context, it is stated that after the 1979 Revolution, Iran adopted policies such as support for the Palestinian cause and anti-Israelism as a normative obligation and an identity belonging. The 7 October attack, on the other hand, was a critical turning point for Iran, which reinforced its anti-Israel stance but revealed its limited capacity to effectively support the Palestinian cause. The study argues that after the 7 October attack, despite Iran's support for Hamas and the broader Axis of Resistance, its actions were strategically measured and it pursued a policy of controlled tension that sought to limit the conflict. This is mainly due to the fact that Iran lacks the material capacity to meet its normative obligations. In this context, through discourse and content analyses of official statements, media sources and speeches, the increasing tension between Iran's normative obligations and material realities has been revealed. On the other hand, it has been argued that Israel's policy of escalation has put Iran's policy of controlled tension into difficulty, and this situation has brought new threats and challenges for both Iran and Israel.

MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar DergisiVol. 14(2)
Adana Science and Technology University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.