Analisis Perbandingan Antara Perumahan Subsidi dengan Perumahan Green Building

This study compares subsidized housing with Green Building housing based on cost, energy efficiency, occupant quality of life, and environmental impact. The government supports subsidized housing to provide affordable housing for low-income people, although the initial cost is low and often has ordinary building quality standards and higher operating costs. On the other hand, Green Building housing emphasizes sustainability by providing better energy efficiency, more efficient use of resources, and a healthier living environment. However, it requires a higher initial investment. The results of the analysis show that although subsidized housing is more economical at the beginning, Green Building provides significant long-term benefits in terms of energy and water savings and improves occupants' quality of life. Combining Green Building elements in subsidized housing development is recommended to improve the quality and sustainability of housing for low-income people. This study concludes that a hybrid approach integrating Green Building principles in a subsidized housing development can effectively solve housing and environmental challenges

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAUR (JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM RESEARCH)
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31289/jaur.v8i1.12572
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analisis Perbandingan Antara Perumahan Subsidi dengan Perumahan Green Building

Cut Nuraini, Tri Widya Wardani, Syahara Syahara, Windu Terkelin et al.
1 citations
JAUR (JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM RESEARCH)
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.27
article

Analisis Perbandingan Antara Perumahan Subsidi dengan Perumahan Green Building

Cut Nuraini, Tri Widya Wardani, Syahara Syahara, Windu Terkelin, Sri Shindi Indira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study compares subsidized housing with Green Building housing based on cost, energy efficiency, occupant quality of life, and environmental impact. The government supports subsidized housing to provide affordable housing for low-income people, although the initial cost is low and often has ordinary building quality standards and higher operating costs. On the other hand, Green Building housing emphasizes sustainability by providing better energy efficiency, more efficient use of resources, and a healthier living environment. However, it requires a higher initial investment. The results of the analysis show that although subsidized housing is more economical at the beginning, Green Building provides significant long-term benefits in terms of energy and water savings and improves occupants' quality of life. Combining Green Building elements in subsidized housing development is recommended to improve the quality and sustainability of housing for low-income people. This study concludes that a hybrid approach integrating Green Building principles in a subsidized housing development can effectively solve housing and environmental challenges

JAUR (JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM RESEARCH)Vol. 8(1)
U.S. Green Building Council (US), Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Medan (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.