Benchmarking AI and human text classifications in the context of newspaper frames: A multi-label LLM classification approach

I examine the abilities of large language models (LLMs) to accurately classify topics related to immigration from Spanish-language newspaper articles. I benchmark various LLMs (ChatGPT and Claude) and undergraduate coders with my own codings. I prompt models to label articles with either an 8 label scheme—directly analogous to the assignment of the undergraduate coders—or a 4 label scheme—aggregating the 8 labels into broader themes. In my analyses, a Few Shot ChatGPT 4o model with 8 labels emerges as the most reliable LLM classifier and comes close to the undergraduate coders, with models using 8 labels generally outperforming their 4 label counterparts. I also find that LLMs tend toward false positive errors. This application provides practical methodological guidance for applied researchers using LLMs in data coding. Overall, I demonstrate how LLMs can be effective supplements to human coders, as well as the continued value of human coding as a benchmark for text classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research & Politics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680251332353
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking AI and human text classifications in the context of newspaper frames: A multi-label LLM classification approach

Alexander Tripp
2 citations
Research & Politics
Natural Language Processing Techniques
4.96
article

Benchmarking AI and human text classifications in the context of newspaper frames: A multi-label LLM classification approach

Alexander Tripp
article en
2 citations

Abstract

I examine the abilities of large language models (LLMs) to accurately classify topics related to immigration from Spanish-language newspaper articles. I benchmark various LLMs (ChatGPT and Claude) and undergraduate coders with my own codings. I prompt models to label articles with either an 8 label scheme—directly analogous to the assignment of the undergraduate coders—or a 4 label scheme—aggregating the 8 labels into broader themes. In my analyses, a Few Shot ChatGPT 4o model with 8 labels emerges as the most reliable LLM classifier and comes close to the undergraduate coders, with models using 8 labels generally outperforming their 4 label counterparts. I also find that LLMs tend toward false positive errors. This application provides practical methodological guidance for applied researchers using LLMs in data coding. Overall, I demonstrate how LLMs can be effective supplements to human coders, as well as the continued value of human coding as a benchmark for text classification.

Research & PoliticsVol. 12(2)
Vanderbilt University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Benchmarking AI and human text classifications in the context of newspaper frames: A multi-label LLM classification approach — Alexander Tripp · Research & Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS