ALIRAN ESSENSIALISME DAN REKONSTRUKSIONISME SOSIAL DALAM FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN

This research examines two important currents in educational philosophy, namely essentialism and social reconstructionism. Essentialism emphasizes the importance of mastering basic knowledge and skills, while social reconstructionism focuses on the role of education in reforming society. The aim of this research is to analyze the differences and similarities between the two schools, as well as their implications for contemporary educational practice. The method used is a literature study with a comparative analysis approach. The research results show that although the two schools have fundamental differences in educational goals, they both emphasize the importance of the role of teachers and a structured curriculum. Essentialism tends to maintain the status quo, while social reconstructionism seeks to encourage social change through education. This research concludes that a synthesis of the two streams can provide a more comprehensive framework for facing educational challenges in the modern era.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Muaddib Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46773/muaddib.v6i4.1284
Primary Topic
Education and Character Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ALIRAN ESSENSIALISME DAN REKONSTRUKSIONISME SOSIAL DALAM FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN

Aufar Rifqi Pratama, Mukh Nursikin
Al-Muaddib Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan
Education and Character Development
article

ALIRAN ESSENSIALISME DAN REKONSTRUKSIONISME SOSIAL DALAM FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN

Aufar Rifqi Pratama, Mukh Nursikin
article en

Abstract

This research examines two important currents in educational philosophy, namely essentialism and social reconstructionism. Essentialism emphasizes the importance of mastering basic knowledge and skills, while social reconstructionism focuses on the role of education in reforming society. The aim of this research is to analyze the differences and similarities between the two schools, as well as their implications for contemporary educational practice. The method used is a literature study with a comparative analysis approach. The research results show that although the two schools have fundamental differences in educational goals, they both emphasize the importance of the role of teachers and a structured curriculum. Essentialism tends to maintain the status quo, while social reconstructionism seeks to encourage social change through education. This research concludes that a synthesis of the two streams can provide a more comprehensive framework for facing educational challenges in the modern era.

Al-Muaddib Jurnal Kajian Ilmu KependidikanVol. 6(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Education and Character Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

ALIRAN ESSENSIALISME DAN REKONSTRUKSIONISME SOSIAL DALAM FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN — Aufar Rifqi Pratama, Mukh Nursikin · Al-Muaddib Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS