Losing Phonotactic Distinctions in Context

Previous psycholinguistic research has demonstrated that sentence processing varies according to both syntactic and discourse context. However, a systematic investigation of how such contexts influence how the processor manages low-level representations of linguistic structure has yet to be carried out. In this paper, we conduct a series of self-paced reading experiments which show how one well-established linguistic measurement-phonotactic distinctions between non-words-varies according to the phonological, syntactic, and discourse context that the non-words appear in. Our results demonstrate that the various types of context that we control for can influence both when and if phonotactic distinctions surface. More broadly, our findings suggest that well-established phonological and psycholinguistic effects may not generalize when tested in larger contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Science
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70059
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Losing Phonotactic Distinctions in Context

Marten van Schijndel, John M. Starr
Cognitive Science
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Losing Phonotactic Distinctions in Context

Marten van Schijndel, John M. Starr
article en

Abstract

Previous psycholinguistic research has demonstrated that sentence processing varies according to both syntactic and discourse context. However, a systematic investigation of how such contexts influence how the processor manages low-level representations of linguistic structure has yet to be carried out. In this paper, we conduct a series of self-paced reading experiments which show how one well-established linguistic measurement-phonotactic distinctions between non-words-varies according to the phonological, syntactic, and discourse context that the non-words appear in. Our results demonstrate that the various types of context that we control for can influence both when and if phonotactic distinctions surface. More broadly, our findings suggest that well-established phonological and psycholinguistic effects may not generalize when tested in larger contexts.

Cognitive ScienceVol. 49(4)
Cornell University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.