Obesity: is it a common health problem among faculty members at the university? A cross-sectional study

Academic professionals are notably vulnerable to weight gain, often due to sedentary lifestyles, high-stress levels and irregular eating patterns, which exacerbate the risk of obesity and related health complications. This study aimed to evaluate weight status using anthropometric and dietary intake of academics at Jerash Private University. A cross-sectional study involved 103 faculty members from Jerash Private University in Jordan, selected randomly. Socio-demographic information and anthropometric measurements were collected, and dietary intake using a 24-hour recall and food frequency questionnaire was assessed. Of the total, 76.7% were males and 23.3% were females. The mean age was 47.85 ± 10.46 years, weight was 84.32 ± 16.06 kg, height was 171.04 ± 7.92 cm, waist circumference (wc) was 99.95 ± 16.05 cm and body mass index (BMI) was 28.73 ± 4.69 kg/m^2. Overweight was observed in 48.1% of males and 50.0% of females. There were no significant differences in macronutrient intake (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber) among the participants across the different BMI groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in food groups intake among the participants across the different BMI groups, except for grain, where overweight participants had significantly the highest percent intake from recommended grain intake (38.12 ± 3.13; p = 0.037). The average recommended intake of food groups based on MyPyramid for normal, overweight and obese participants respectively were 8.06 ± 0.39 oz, 9.14 ± 0.16 oz and 9.83 ± 0.08 oz, from grain, 3.24 ± 0.14 cup, 3.57 ± 0.06 cup and 3.82 ± 0.05 cup from vegetables, 2.09 ± 0.08 cup, 2.27 ± 0.04 cup, and 2.44 ± 0.03 from fruit, 3.00 ± 0.00 cup from dairy (for all participants) and 6.26 ± 0.17oz, 6.70 ± 0.05 oz, and 6.94 ± 0.03 oz from protein. The academics had a high prevalence of obesity. Further studies investigating the actual cause of obesity in this category of population are needed. Key words: Food group intake, Faculty members, Nutritional status, BMI, Overweight, Obesity

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.140.25685
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Lifestyle Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obesity: is it a common health problem among faculty members at the university? A cross-sectional study

Lana M. Agraib, Mahmoud S. Elfakharany, SF Shnaigat, FG Hammouh et al.
1 citations
African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development
Health and Lifestyle Studies
2.82
article

Obesity: is it a common health problem among faculty members at the university? A cross-sectional study

Lana M. Agraib, Mahmoud S. Elfakharany, SF Shnaigat, FG Hammouh, AS Aslaih
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Academic professionals are notably vulnerable to weight gain, often due to sedentary lifestyles, high-stress levels and irregular eating patterns, which exacerbate the risk of obesity and related health complications. This study aimed to evaluate weight status using anthropometric and dietary intake of academics at Jerash Private University. A cross-sectional study involved 103 faculty members from Jerash Private University in Jordan, selected randomly. Socio-demographic information and anthropometric measurements were collected, and dietary intake using a 24-hour recall and food frequency questionnaire was assessed. Of the total, 76.7% were males and 23.3% were females. The mean age was 47.85 ± 10.46 years, weight was 84.32 ± 16.06 kg, height was 171.04 ± 7.92 cm, waist circumference (wc) was 99.95 ± 16.05 cm and body mass index (BMI) was 28.73 ± 4.69 kg/m^2. Overweight was observed in 48.1% of males and 50.0% of females. There were no significant differences in macronutrient intake (energy, protein, fat, carbohydrate, and fiber) among the participants across the different BMI groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in food groups intake among the participants across the different BMI groups, except for grain, where overweight participants had significantly the highest percent intake from recommended grain intake (38.12 ± 3.13; p = 0.037). The average recommended intake of food groups based on MyPyramid for normal, overweight and obese participants respectively were 8.06 ± 0.39 oz, 9.14 ± 0.16 oz and 9.83 ± 0.08 oz, from grain, 3.24 ± 0.14 cup, 3.57 ± 0.06 cup and 3.82 ± 0.05 cup from vegetables, 2.09 ± 0.08 cup, 2.27 ± 0.04 cup, and 2.44 ± 0.03 from fruit, 3.00 ± 0.00 cup from dairy (for all participants) and 6.26 ± 0.17oz, 6.70 ± 0.05 oz, and 6.94 ± 0.03 oz from protein. The academics had a high prevalence of obesity. Further studies investigating the actual cause of obesity in this category of population are needed. Key words: Food group intake, Faculty members, Nutritional status, BMI, Overweight, Obesity

African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and DevelopmentVol. 25(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health and Lifestyle Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.