Non‐Native Earthworms Alter Carbon Sequestration in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems

Abstract Earthworms, as detritivores, play a significant role in breaking down soil organic carbon (SOC). The introduction of non‐native earthworms to arctic ecosystems has, therefore, raised concerns about the potential impact they may have on one of the world's largest SOC reservoirs. Earthworms could also have considerable effects on plant productivity, and the lack of experimental studies quantifying their impact on carbon (C) reservoirs in both soil and plants makes it difficult to predict the effect of earthworms on ecosystem C storage. Here we experimentally tested how earthworms known to be non‐native to arctic ecosystems (Aporrectodea spp. and Lumbricus spp.) affect C reservoirs in soil and plants (above and belowground separately) in two common tundra vegetation types (heath and meadow). Earthworms lowered the mean SOC pool and substantially altered SOC quality in meadow soils by increasing the proportion of aromatic‐C compounds. Simultaneously, earthworms increased the C pool stored in plant biomass, which counteracted earthworm‐induced SOC losses in meadow ecosystems. A positive earthworm effect on belowground biomass in heath soil facilitated a net ecosystem uptake of ∼0.84 kg C m −2 over the 4‐year study period. The higher C uptake into plant biomass in the heath resulted in a notable increase of SOC but lower δ 13 C values, likely because of recently captured C being sourced from roots or litter. Our observations of vegetation‐specific feedbacks between plants, earthworms, and soils advance our understanding of non‐native earthworms' impact on SOC dynamics and C budgets in high‐latitude ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jg008598
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐Native Earthworms Alter Carbon Sequestration in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems

Gesche Blume‐Werry, Johan Olofsson, Emma Arvidsson, Adrian Wackett et al.
2 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
3.43
article

Non‐Native Earthworms Alter Carbon Sequestration in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems

Gesche Blume‐Werry, Johan Olofsson, Emma Arvidsson, Adrian Wackett, Jonatan Klaminder, Hanna Jonsson, Tobias Sparrman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Earthworms, as detritivores, play a significant role in breaking down soil organic carbon (SOC). The introduction of non‐native earthworms to arctic ecosystems has, therefore, raised concerns about the potential impact they may have on one of the world's largest SOC reservoirs. Earthworms could also have considerable effects on plant productivity, and the lack of experimental studies quantifying their impact on carbon (C) reservoirs in both soil and plants makes it difficult to predict the effect of earthworms on ecosystem C storage. Here we experimentally tested how earthworms known to be non‐native to arctic ecosystems (Aporrectodea spp. and Lumbricus spp.) affect C reservoirs in soil and plants (above and belowground separately) in two common tundra vegetation types (heath and meadow). Earthworms lowered the mean SOC pool and substantially altered SOC quality in meadow soils by increasing the proportion of aromatic‐C compounds. Simultaneously, earthworms increased the C pool stored in plant biomass, which counteracted earthworm‐induced SOC losses in meadow ecosystems. A positive earthworm effect on belowground biomass in heath soil facilitated a net ecosystem uptake of ∼0.84 kg C m −2 over the 4‐year study period. The higher C uptake into plant biomass in the heath resulted in a notable increase of SOC but lower δ 13 C values, likely because of recently captured C being sourced from roots or litter. Our observations of vegetation‐specific feedbacks between plants, earthworms, and soils advance our understanding of non‐native earthworms' impact on SOC dynamics and C budgets in high‐latitude ecosystems.

Journal of Geophysical Research BiogeosciencesVol. 130(4)
Planetary Science Institute (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Umeå University (SE), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, American-Scandinavian Foundation, Eli Lilly and Company, Stiftelsen Oscar och Lili Lamms Minne, Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer, Polarforskningssekretariatet, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.