Accident rutier soldat cu moartea unei persoane provocat de un conducător care anterior a consumat alcool sau droguri. Ucidere din culpă sau omor?

Recently, in the public space and then in judicial practice, a new solution has been discussed regarding the legal qualification of the act of a person who, after consuming alcohol and/or drugs, while driving a motor vehicle, causes an accident resulting in the death of a person, in the sense that it would not be an offence of manslaughter but the offence of murder committed with indirect intent. In this hypothesis, the major question is raised as to the capacity of thinking, of critical judgment, of the person who consumed alcohol and/or drugs, in the sense specified by the courts, which found that these persons foresaw and accepted the possibility of an uncertain event – the road traffic accident – occurring, that these persons based their choice on possible, unconfirmed aspects and thus foresaw and accepted the possibility of an event resulting in the death of persons. In our opinion, such a person not only does not accept the possibility of such an outcome, because he or she believes (under the influence of the substances in question) that it cannot happen to him or her, but also that he or she has the skills and possibilities to avoid such an event.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies
Published
2024-12-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47745/ausleg.2023.13.x.04
Primary Topic
Restraint-Related Deaths
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accident rutier soldat cu moartea unei persoane provocat de un conducător care anterior a consumat alcool sau droguri. Ucidere din culpă sau omor?

Nicoleta-Elena Hegheș, Simona Franguloiu, Mihnea Costescu
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies
Restraint-Related Deaths
article

Accident rutier soldat cu moartea unei persoane provocat de un conducător care anterior a consumat alcool sau droguri. Ucidere din culpă sau omor?

Nicoleta-Elena Hegheș, Simona Franguloiu, Mihnea Costescu
article en

Abstract

Recently, in the public space and then in judicial practice, a new solution has been discussed regarding the legal qualification of the act of a person who, after consuming alcohol and/or drugs, while driving a motor vehicle, causes an accident resulting in the death of a person, in the sense that it would not be an offence of manslaughter but the offence of murder committed with indirect intent. In this hypothesis, the major question is raised as to the capacity of thinking, of critical judgment, of the person who consumed alcohol and/or drugs, in the sense specified by the courts, which found that these persons foresaw and accepted the possibility of an uncertain event – the road traffic accident – occurring, that these persons based their choice on possible, unconfirmed aspects and thus foresaw and accepted the possibility of an event resulting in the death of persons. In our opinion, such a person not only does not accept the possibility of such an outcome, because he or she believes (under the influence of the substances in question) that it cannot happen to him or her, but also that he or she has the skills and possibilities to avoid such an event.

Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal StudiesVol. 13(Special Issue)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Restraint-Related Deaths
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.