Fragmentation and the Preface Paradox

Abstract The preface paradox is often taken to show that beliefs can be individually rational but jointly inconsistent. However, this received conflict between rationality and consistency is unfounded. This paper seeks to show that no rational beliefs are actually inconsistent in the preface paradox

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Episteme
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2025.20
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fragmentation and the Preface Paradox

Ethan Lai
Episteme
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Fragmentation and the Preface Paradox

Ethan Lai
article en

Abstract

Abstract The preface paradox is often taken to show that beliefs can be individually rational but jointly inconsistent. However, this received conflict between rationality and consistency is unfounded. This paper seeks to show that no rational beliefs are actually inconsistent in the preface paradox

Episteme
Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fragmentation and the Preface Paradox — Ethan Lai · Episteme (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS