Variability and Reliability of the Axivity AX6 Accelerometer in Technical and Human Motion Conditions

This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-instrument variability and reliability of the Axivity AX6 accelerometer under controlled technical conditions and human motion scenarios. In the first experiment, 12 accelerometers were affixed to a vibration platform and tested at four frequencies (2.2, 3.2, 6.5, and 9.4 Hz) along three axes to assess frequency- and axis-dependent variability. In the second experiment, four AX6 accelerometers were simultaneously placed on a subject's wrist and tested under four human motion conditions (walking at 4 km·h<sup>-1</sup> and 6 km·h<sup>-1</sup> and running at 8 km·h<sup>-1</sup> and 10 km·h<sup>-1</sup>). Results demonstrated low intra- and inter-instrument variability (CVintra: 3.3-4.5%; CVinter: 6.3-7.7%) with high reliability (ICC = 0.98). Similar results were observed in human motion conditions (CVintra: 5.3-8.8%; CVinter: 7.1-10.4%), with ICC values of 0.98 for combined devices, and 0.99 for each device individually. Despite statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between devices in human motion all conditions, the variations remained below the minimal clinically significant difference threshold. These findings indicate that under technical conditions on a vibrating platform, and within the range of typical human accelerations, the Axivity AX6 is a reliable tool for measuring accelerations representative of physical activity. However, further research is necessary to validate its performance under free-living conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25082480
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variability and Reliability of the Axivity AX6 Accelerometer in Technical and Human Motion Conditions

Nuria Garatachea, Pedro J. Marín, Esther Pueyo, Javier Ramos Maqueda et al.
3 citations
Sensors
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
2.02
article

Variability and Reliability of the Axivity AX6 Accelerometer in Technical and Human Motion Conditions

Nuria Garatachea, Pedro J. Marín, Esther Pueyo, Javier Ramos Maqueda, Marcos Echevarría-Polo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-instrument variability and reliability of the Axivity AX6 accelerometer under controlled technical conditions and human motion scenarios. In the first experiment, 12 accelerometers were affixed to a vibration platform and tested at four frequencies (2.2, 3.2, 6.5, and 9.4 Hz) along three axes to assess frequency- and axis-dependent variability. In the second experiment, four AX6 accelerometers were simultaneously placed on a subject's wrist and tested under four human motion conditions (walking at 4 km·h<sup>-1</sup> and 6 km·h<sup>-1</sup> and running at 8 km·h<sup>-1</sup> and 10 km·h<sup>-1</sup>). Results demonstrated low intra- and inter-instrument variability (CVintra: 3.3-4.5%; CVinter: 6.3-7.7%) with high reliability (ICC = 0.98). Similar results were observed in human motion conditions (CVintra: 5.3-8.8%; CVinter: 7.1-10.4%), with ICC values of 0.98 for combined devices, and 0.99 for each device individually. Despite statistically significant differences (<i>p</i> < 0.05) between devices in human motion all conditions, the variations remained below the minimal clinically significant difference threshold. These findings indicate that under technical conditions on a vibrating platform, and within the range of typical human accelerations, the Axivity AX6 is a reliable tool for measuring accelerations representative of physical activity. However, further research is necessary to validate its performance under free-living conditions.

SensorsVol. 25(8)
Mental Research Institute (US), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Gobierno de Aragón, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.