Using contextual measures to capture citizens’ perception of inequality in their surrounding environment

Abstract A growing literature explores the effect of economic inequality in citizens’ surrounding environment on their political attitudes and behavior. This literature typically relies on measures of income concentration or gap-size, which reflect under-tested presumptions about how citizens perceive the economic conditions surrounding them. Utilizing survey data to explore perception of economic inequality in Americans’ residential environment, this note finds that measures capturing income concentration or gap-size perform poorly relative to a measure capturing the joint prevalence of “haves” and “have-nots.” These results suggest that commonly used measures of economic inequality may not fully capture the features of people’s daily environment used to perceive the existence or magnitude of inequality. The results guide future research toward using contextual indicators that treat inequality as a compound phenomenon involving manifestations of poverty and affluence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Science Research and Methods
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using contextual measures to capture citizens’ perception of inequality in their surrounding environment

Benjamin J. Newman
2 citations
Political Science Research and Methods
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
8.40
article

Using contextual measures to capture citizens’ perception of inequality in their surrounding environment

Benjamin J. Newman
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract A growing literature explores the effect of economic inequality in citizens’ surrounding environment on their political attitudes and behavior. This literature typically relies on measures of income concentration or gap-size, which reflect under-tested presumptions about how citizens perceive the economic conditions surrounding them. Utilizing survey data to explore perception of economic inequality in Americans’ residential environment, this note finds that measures capturing income concentration or gap-size perform poorly relative to a measure capturing the joint prevalence of “haves” and “have-nots.” These results suggest that commonly used measures of economic inequality may not fully capture the features of people’s daily environment used to perceive the existence or magnitude of inequality. The results guide future research toward using contextual indicators that treat inequality as a compound phenomenon involving manifestations of poverty and affluence.

Political Science Research and MethodsVol. 14(2)
Public Policy Institute of California (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using contextual measures to capture citizens’ perception of inequality in their surrounding environment — Benjamin J. Newman · Political Science Research and Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS