Combining nutritional value with environmental impact: a novel approach to nutritional life cycle assessment

In nutritional life cycle assessment (nLCA), nutrient provision is the key function of foods. This warrants replacing the traditional mass-based functional unit (FU) in LCA by a nutrient-based FU. However, such replacement causes several methodological issues and there is at present no uniform approach for integrating nutritional value into the FU of LCA. We therefore propose a novel approach where the mass-based FU is adjusted for nutritional value using a dimensionless Qualifying Index (QI). To demonstrate our approach, we calculated the nLCA for 164 food items from the environmental impact database of foods made by The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. We used global warming potential (GWP, in kg CO2 eq/kg) as indicator of environmental impact. As a measure of nutritional value, we used the QI, a dimensionless, numerical value expressing the relation between nutrient density and energy density of a food. To calculate the QI, we selected 21 qualifying nutrients, based on their contribution to the overall Dutch dietary intake. All QIs were calculated with and without capping to assess the influence of (excessively) high nutrient levels, and weighting was applied to calculate food-group-specific QIs. For the majority of the 164 food items considered, the calculated QI was above 1, with higher values of QI representing higher nutrient density. The highest QI values were observed for vegetables and fish, whereas the lowest QI values were observed for fats, oils, and grain products. GWP values were highest for protein foods and lowest for fruits, vegetables, and grain products. For most foods, GWP decreased after nutritional adjustment, as their QI values were > 1. Food-group-specific weighting led to more distinctive GWP values. Additional analysis showed that the QI-nLCA methodology can be applied not only to compare individual food items, but also meals and diets. This study introduces a novel approach to nLCA, in which the original mass-based FU is corrected for by the QI, a numerical value expressing the relation between nutrient density and energy density of a food. This QI-nLCA enables a more comprehensive evaluation of foods, meals, and diets. It can be applied to different environmental indicators and, as such, could add to evidence-based decision-making by policy makers in the field of healthy and sustainable nutrition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-025-02465-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining nutritional value with environmental impact: a novel approach to nutritional life cycle assessment

Jan M.W. Geurts, Stephan Peters, Manon van Eijsden, Thom Huppertz et al.
2 citations
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
article

Combining nutritional value with environmental impact: a novel approach to nutritional life cycle assessment

Jan M.W. Geurts, Stephan Peters, Manon van Eijsden, Thom Huppertz, Olaf F. A. Larsen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In nutritional life cycle assessment (nLCA), nutrient provision is the key function of foods. This warrants replacing the traditional mass-based functional unit (FU) in LCA by a nutrient-based FU. However, such replacement causes several methodological issues and there is at present no uniform approach for integrating nutritional value into the FU of LCA. We therefore propose a novel approach where the mass-based FU is adjusted for nutritional value using a dimensionless Qualifying Index (QI). To demonstrate our approach, we calculated the nLCA for 164 food items from the environmental impact database of foods made by The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. We used global warming potential (GWP, in kg CO2 eq/kg) as indicator of environmental impact. As a measure of nutritional value, we used the QI, a dimensionless, numerical value expressing the relation between nutrient density and energy density of a food. To calculate the QI, we selected 21 qualifying nutrients, based on their contribution to the overall Dutch dietary intake. All QIs were calculated with and without capping to assess the influence of (excessively) high nutrient levels, and weighting was applied to calculate food-group-specific QIs. For the majority of the 164 food items considered, the calculated QI was above 1, with higher values of QI representing higher nutrient density. The highest QI values were observed for vegetables and fish, whereas the lowest QI values were observed for fats, oils, and grain products. GWP values were highest for protein foods and lowest for fruits, vegetables, and grain products. For most foods, GWP decreased after nutritional adjustment, as their QI values were > 1. Food-group-specific weighting led to more distinctive GWP values. Additional analysis showed that the QI-nLCA methodology can be applied not only to compare individual food items, but also meals and diets. This study introduces a novel approach to nLCA, in which the original mass-based FU is corrected for by the QI, a numerical value expressing the relation between nutrient density and energy density of a food. This QI-nLCA enables a more comprehensive evaluation of foods, meals, and diets. It can be applied to different environmental indicators and, as such, could add to evidence-based decision-making by policy makers in the field of healthy and sustainable nutrition.

The International Journal of Life Cycle AssessmentVol. 30(9)
FrieslandCampina (Netherlands) (NL), University College Cork (IE), Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (NL), Hovon (NL), Yakult (Netherlands) (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Zuivel Organisatie
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.