What are the key capabilities needed by university teachers and are these embedded in existing frameworks?

Abstract This study aims to identify the key capabilities needed by university teachers and to examine the extent to which current university frameworks specify and define standards for these skills. This paper is based on extensive literature review and comparative study of individual university frameworks utilising a comparative document analysis. Our key findings are that there is a diverse range of capabilities cited across the literature but only a weak consensus in the frameworks about the key skills and future focused capabilities needed by university teachers. We also find that very few frameworks define levels of performance, and they are prescriptive, with a focus on competence rather than capabilities. Our findings reveal that the available frameworks lack utility for capability development because most lack guidance on definitions of what knowledge, skills and attributes university teachers need to be effective in their roles. Thus, we provide insights into these critical but relatively unstudied issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Australian Educational Researcher
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00831-7
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What are the key capabilities needed by university teachers and are these embedded in existing frameworks?

Ieva Stupans, Brendan O’Connell, Margaret Jollands
The Australian Educational Researcher
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

What are the key capabilities needed by university teachers and are these embedded in existing frameworks?

Ieva Stupans, Brendan O’Connell, Margaret Jollands
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to identify the key capabilities needed by university teachers and to examine the extent to which current university frameworks specify and define standards for these skills. This paper is based on extensive literature review and comparative study of individual university frameworks utilising a comparative document analysis. Our key findings are that there is a diverse range of capabilities cited across the literature but only a weak consensus in the frameworks about the key skills and future focused capabilities needed by university teachers. We also find that very few frameworks define levels of performance, and they are prescriptive, with a focus on competence rather than capabilities. Our findings reveal that the available frameworks lack utility for capability development because most lack guidance on definitions of what knowledge, skills and attributes university teachers need to be effective in their roles. Thus, we provide insights into these critical but relatively unstudied issues.

The Australian Educational ResearcherVol. 52(3)
RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What are the key capabilities needed by university teachers and are these embedded in existing frameworks? — Ieva Stupans, Brendan O’Connell, et al. · The Australian Educational Researcher (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS