More of the same or manifold perspectives?

The increasing importance of social media in political communication since Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign has led to a highly productive, dynamic, and ever-growing field of scholars researching the use of social media by politicians. However, academic literature in recent years has also featured debates about the heterogeneity of research in this area. It is commonly assumed and critically discussed that these studies primarily revolve around a U.S. context and use Twitter as a primary source of data, and that research time frames focus on election campaigns and neglect communication outside of election times. Yet, we still lack the data to support these assumptions. Against this background, we systematically analyze, document, and discuss the diversity of existing research on politicians’ use of social media between 2004 and 2020. In this context, we investigate the research objects of the existing studies, the theoretical backgrounds and methods used, and where they were conducted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Communication Sciences
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2025.02.6050
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More of the same or manifold perspectives?

Julia Metag, Florian Wintterlin, Kira Klinger, Lukas Lindenschmidt
Studies in Communication Sciences
Social Media and Politics
article

More of the same or manifold perspectives?

Julia Metag, Florian Wintterlin, Kira Klinger, Lukas Lindenschmidt
article en

Abstract

The increasing importance of social media in political communication since Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign has led to a highly productive, dynamic, and ever-growing field of scholars researching the use of social media by politicians. However, academic literature in recent years has also featured debates about the heterogeneity of research in this area. It is commonly assumed and critically discussed that these studies primarily revolve around a U.S. context and use Twitter as a primary source of data, and that research time frames focus on election campaigns and neglect communication outside of election times. Yet, we still lack the data to support these assumptions. Against this background, we systematically analyze, document, and discuss the diversity of existing research on politicians’ use of social media between 2004 and 2020. In this context, we investigate the research objects of the existing studies, the theoretical backgrounds and methods used, and where they were conducted.

Studies in Communication SciencesVol. 25(2)
University of Münster (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.