Projections of future climate for U.S. national assessments: past, present, future

Climate assessments consolidate our understanding of possible future climate conditions as represented by climate projections, which are largely based on the output of global climate models. Over the past 30 years, the scientific insights gained from climate projections have been refined through model structural improvements, emerging constraints on climate feedbacks, and increased computational efficiency. Within the same period, the process of assessing and evaluating information from climate projections has become more defined and targeted to inform users. As the size and audience of climate assessments has expanded, the framing, relevancy, and accessibility of projections has become increasingly important. This paper reviews the use of climate projections in national climate assessments (NCA) while highlighting challenges and opportunities that have been identified over time. Reflections and lessons learned address the continuous process to understand the broadening assessment audience and evolving user needs. Insights for future NCA development include (1) identifying benchmarks and standards for evaluating downscaled datasets, (2) expanding efforts to gather research gaps and user needs to inform how climate projections are presented in the assessment (3) providing practitioner guidance on the use, interpretation, and reporting of climate projections and uncertainty to better inform decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climatic Change
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03888-6
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Climate variability and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Projections of future climate for U.S. national assessments: past, present, future

Samantha Basile, Allison Crimmins, Wenying Su, Claudia Tebaldi et al.
3 citations
Climatic Change
Climate variability and models
3.32
article

Projections of future climate for U.S. national assessments: past, present, future

Samantha Basile, Allison Crimmins, Wenying Su, Claudia Tebaldi, Kenneth E. Kunkel, Fredric Lipschultz, Adam Terando, David W. Pierce, Katharine Hayhoe, Kate Marvel, Lai-Yung Ruby Leung
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Climate assessments consolidate our understanding of possible future climate conditions as represented by climate projections, which are largely based on the output of global climate models. Over the past 30 years, the scientific insights gained from climate projections have been refined through model structural improvements, emerging constraints on climate feedbacks, and increased computational efficiency. Within the same period, the process of assessing and evaluating information from climate projections has become more defined and targeted to inform users. As the size and audience of climate assessments has expanded, the framing, relevancy, and accessibility of projections has become increasingly important. This paper reviews the use of climate projections in national climate assessments (NCA) while highlighting challenges and opportunities that have been identified over time. Reflections and lessons learned address the continuous process to understand the broadening assessment audience and evolving user needs. Insights for future NCA development include (1) identifying benchmarks and standards for evaluating downscaled datasets, (2) expanding efforts to gather research gaps and user needs to inform how climate projections are presented in the assessment (3) providing practitioner guidance on the use, interpretation, and reporting of climate projections and uncertainty to better inform decision-making.

Climatic ChangeVol. 178(4)
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US), Texas Tech University (US), The Nature Conservancy (US), United States Geological Survey (US), Langley Research Center (US), Universities Space Research Association (US), North Carolina State University (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), SUNY Schenectady County Community College (US), NOAA Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (US), New York Folklore Society (US), Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Climate variability and models
3.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.