Legal Review of Conceptual Differences Between Folklore and Traditional Cultural Expressions in the Context of Intellectual Property Rights

This research examines the differences between folklore and traditional cultural expressions in the context of intellectual property rights, especially in Article 20 paragraph (1) of the PTEBT Bill and Article 38 of the Copyright Law in Indonesia. This research applies normative juridical methods and descriptive analysis through secondary data in the form of journals, articles and other relevant data. Folklore is oral stories and old traditions without a clear creator, while Traditional Cultural Expressions include various aspects of cultural heritage such as fine arts, music, dance and clothing. This difference has meaning in protecting people's rights to their cultural heritage. Article 38 of the Copyright Law states state ownership of Copyright of Traditional Cultural Expressions, ordering the inventory, maintenance and preservation of cultural heritage as an integral part of national identity. Similar guidance is provided by the UNESCO Convention and the TRIPS Agreement. Implementation varies depending on national laws.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ASTONJADRO
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v13i3.15513
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Review of Conceptual Differences Between Folklore and Traditional Cultural Expressions in the Context of Intellectual Property Rights

Muhammad Fikri Haikal
1 links
ASTONJADRO
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
article

Legal Review of Conceptual Differences Between Folklore and Traditional Cultural Expressions in the Context of Intellectual Property Rights

Muhammad Fikri Haikal
article en

Abstract

This research examines the differences between folklore and traditional cultural expressions in the context of intellectual property rights, especially in Article 20 paragraph (1) of the PTEBT Bill and Article 38 of the Copyright Law in Indonesia. This research applies normative juridical methods and descriptive analysis through secondary data in the form of journals, articles and other relevant data. Folklore is oral stories and old traditions without a clear creator, while Traditional Cultural Expressions include various aspects of cultural heritage such as fine arts, music, dance and clothing. This difference has meaning in protecting people's rights to their cultural heritage. Article 38 of the Copyright Law states state ownership of Copyright of Traditional Cultural Expressions, ordering the inventory, maintenance and preservation of cultural heritage as an integral part of national identity. Similar guidance is provided by the UNESCO Convention and the TRIPS Agreement. Implementation varies depending on national laws.

ASTONJADROVol. 13(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.