In-Hospital Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide U.S. Study

<b>Background</b>: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in cancer patients, driven by mutual comorbidities and increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. Impediments can hinder the utilization of anticoagulants among patients with malignancy-drug interactions with chemotherapy, renal dysfunction, drug intolerance, and increased bleeding risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an effective and safe non-pharmacological approach to prevent thromboembolic complications when anticoagulants are not suitable. Cancer patients were generally excluded from the original LAAO trials, and current safety and efficacy in cancer patients remain uncertain. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to analyze in-hospital outcomes of LAAO in US patients with and without cancer between 2016 and 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were extracted using ICD-10-CM codes. <b>Results</b>: Among 12,273 hospitalizations for LAAO across the US representing an estimated 61,365 LAAO procedures, 2.2% (1365 cases) were performed in cancer patients. Older age, male gender, chronic kidney disease, prior stroke, and anemia were more prevalent in the cancer group, with 785 (58%) having a solid malignancy and 580 (42%) having a hematologic malignancy. Compared to non-cancer patients, cancer patients exhibited a higher rate of in-hospital complications (8.8% vs. 5.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), primarily driven by acute kidney injury (4.4% vs. 2.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.002), acute heart failure (3.7% vs. 2.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), and cardiac tamponade (1.5% vs. 0.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in vascular complications, periprocedural stroke, or in-hospital mortality. Average length of stay (LOS) was longer in cancer patients (1.4 ± 2.7 days vs. 1.8 ± 2.5 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: This nationwide study found that cancer patients undergoing LAAO had an increased rate of in-hospital complications, particularly acute kidney injury, heart failure, and tamponade, but no increase in in-hospital mortality was observed. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of LAAO for managing embolic prevention in this complex patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081331
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-Hospital Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide U.S. Study

Eran Leshem‐Rubinow, Gilad Margolis, Mark Kazatsker, Ariel Roguin et al.
3 citations
Cancers
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
4.16
article

In-Hospital Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Among Cancer Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide U.S. Study

Eran Leshem‐Rubinow, Gilad Margolis, Mark Kazatsker, Ariel Roguin, Adam Folman, Lev Vishnevskiy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in cancer patients, driven by mutual comorbidities and increasing the risk of thromboembolic events. Impediments can hinder the utilization of anticoagulants among patients with malignancy-drug interactions with chemotherapy, renal dysfunction, drug intolerance, and increased bleeding risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an effective and safe non-pharmacological approach to prevent thromboembolic complications when anticoagulants are not suitable. Cancer patients were generally excluded from the original LAAO trials, and current safety and efficacy in cancer patients remain uncertain. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to analyze in-hospital outcomes of LAAO in US patients with and without cancer between 2016 and 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedures, and in-hospital outcomes were extracted using ICD-10-CM codes. <b>Results</b>: Among 12,273 hospitalizations for LAAO across the US representing an estimated 61,365 LAAO procedures, 2.2% (1365 cases) were performed in cancer patients. Older age, male gender, chronic kidney disease, prior stroke, and anemia were more prevalent in the cancer group, with 785 (58%) having a solid malignancy and 580 (42%) having a hematologic malignancy. Compared to non-cancer patients, cancer patients exhibited a higher rate of in-hospital complications (8.8% vs. 5.7%; <i>p</i> < 0.001), primarily driven by acute kidney injury (4.4% vs. 2.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.002), acute heart failure (3.7% vs. 2.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.012), and cardiac tamponade (1.5% vs. 0.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in vascular complications, periprocedural stroke, or in-hospital mortality. Average length of stay (LOS) was longer in cancer patients (1.4 ± 2.7 days vs. 1.8 ± 2.5 days; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: This nationwide study found that cancer patients undergoing LAAO had an increased rate of in-hospital complications, particularly acute kidney injury, heart failure, and tamponade, but no increase in in-hospital mortality was observed. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of LAAO for managing embolic prevention in this complex patient population.

CancersVol. 17(8)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (IL)
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
4.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.