Research on RV Reducer Shaft Bearing Force and Structural Optimization

This paper addresses the unclear bearing force of an RV reducer shaft by establishing a transmission model and analyzing the force situation of each component. Three force models for the crank support bearing, swivel arm bearing, and main bearing are developed. The force variations under different working conditions and the impact of structural parameters on shaft bearing forces are analyzed. Structural optimization is performed using Kriging-NSGA-II to minimize bearing forces. The results show similar load patterns for the bearings, with the force magnitude being ranked in the following order: rotating arm > crank support > main bearing. After optimization, the bearing forces are reduced by 8.26% for the crank support shaft, 10.35% for the rotating arm shaft, and 5.15% for the main shaft.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lubricants
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants13040182
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on RV Reducer Shaft Bearing Force and Structural Optimization

Xiaoxu Pang, Minghao Yang, Wu Hai, Q Li et al.
2 citations
Lubricants
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
1.43
article

Research on RV Reducer Shaft Bearing Force and Structural Optimization

Xiaoxu Pang, Minghao Yang, Wu Hai, Q Li, Xinlong Wang, Duo Liu, Dingkang Zhu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper addresses the unclear bearing force of an RV reducer shaft by establishing a transmission model and analyzing the force situation of each component. Three force models for the crank support bearing, swivel arm bearing, and main bearing are developed. The force variations under different working conditions and the impact of structural parameters on shaft bearing forces are analyzed. Structural optimization is performed using Kriging-NSGA-II to minimize bearing forces. The results show similar load patterns for the bearings, with the force magnitude being ranked in the following order: rotating arm > crank support > main bearing. After optimization, the bearing forces are reduced by 8.26% for the crank support shaft, 10.35% for the rotating arm shaft, and 5.15% for the main shaft.

LubricantsVol. 13(4)
Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on RV Reducer Shaft Bearing Force and Structural Optimization — Xiaoxu Pang, Minghao Yang, et al. · Lubricants (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS