Holding the line: Austrian neutrality in the shadow of the war in Ukraine

This article examines the long-term implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on the future of military neutrality in Europe, focusing on Austria—the most prominent constitutionally neutral European Union (EU) member state outside the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Using a mixed-methods approach, including a pair of survey experiments and elite interviews with Austrian officials involved in navigating neutrality, the study investigates whether Austria’s public and elite opinion can be swayed to reconsider neutrality and pursue more robust integration with NATO. The findings reveal a strong attachment to neutrality among respondents and interviewees, despite the heightened threat perception following the war in Ukraine and the impact of Finland and Sweden’s recent NATO accession. Specifically, no significant shift in support for abandoning neutrality is identified, even with strong EU endorsements or when demonstrating the potential economic and security incentives of such a policy shift. The results stress the deep-seated historical, legal, and emotional foundations of Austria’s neutrality and the legal complexities of amending it, implying that it is expected to remain a fundamental aspect of its national identity and foreign policy. This raises questions about the adaptability of neutrality policies in small states facing evolving regional security dynamics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cooperation and Conflict
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00108367251327685
Citations
2
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Holding the line: Austrian neutrality in the shadow of the war in Ukraine

Eyal Rubinson
2 citations
Cooperation and Conflict
European Union Policy and Governance
17.04
article

Holding the line: Austrian neutrality in the shadow of the war in Ukraine

Eyal Rubinson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article examines the long-term implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on the future of military neutrality in Europe, focusing on Austria—the most prominent constitutionally neutral European Union (EU) member state outside the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Using a mixed-methods approach, including a pair of survey experiments and elite interviews with Austrian officials involved in navigating neutrality, the study investigates whether Austria’s public and elite opinion can be swayed to reconsider neutrality and pursue more robust integration with NATO. The findings reveal a strong attachment to neutrality among respondents and interviewees, despite the heightened threat perception following the war in Ukraine and the impact of Finland and Sweden’s recent NATO accession. Specifically, no significant shift in support for abandoning neutrality is identified, even with strong EU endorsements or when demonstrating the potential economic and security incentives of such a policy shift. The results stress the deep-seated historical, legal, and emotional foundations of Austria’s neutrality and the legal complexities of amending it, implying that it is expected to remain a fundamental aspect of its national identity and foreign policy. This raises questions about the adaptability of neutrality policies in small states facing evolving regional security dynamics.

Cooperation and ConflictVol. 61(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European Union Policy and Governance
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.