Applying machine learning to input–output analysis: a new perspective on identifying key Australian industries

Abstract This article employs two alternative approaches based on input–output tables to re-evaluate key Australian industries and their interconnections. The first approach utilizes traditional linkages, while the second approach employs machine learning methods. Data come from the OECD database for input–output tables spanning the years 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2018. Our findings indicate that employing machine learning methods including clustering with PCA, eigenvector centrality, authority and hub scores, and vertex centralities to identify key Australian industries not only confirming the ranking of key industries through traditional methods but also reveals the interconnectedness of key industries within clusters. While the former approach merely identifies key industries, the latter provides a more comprehensive analysis by demonstrating the ranking and connectivity of key industries, as well as validating the robustness of the applied methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Structures
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-025-00351-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying machine learning to input–output analysis: a new perspective on identifying key Australian industries

Ali Faridzad
2 citations
Journal of Economic Structures
Regional resilience and development
6.26
article

Applying machine learning to input–output analysis: a new perspective on identifying key Australian industries

Ali Faridzad
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article employs two alternative approaches based on input–output tables to re-evaluate key Australian industries and their interconnections. The first approach utilizes traditional linkages, while the second approach employs machine learning methods. Data come from the OECD database for input–output tables spanning the years 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2018. Our findings indicate that employing machine learning methods including clustering with PCA, eigenvector centrality, authority and hub scores, and vertex centralities to identify key Australian industries not only confirming the ranking of key industries through traditional methods but also reveals the interconnectedness of key industries within clusters. While the former approach merely identifies key industries, the latter provides a more comprehensive analysis by demonstrating the ranking and connectivity of key industries, as well as validating the robustness of the applied methodologies.

Journal of Economic StructuresVol. 14(1)
Swinburne University of Technology Sarawak Campus (MY)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Regional resilience and development
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.