PEMBUBARAN KORPORASI: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA SISTEM HUKUM CIVIL LAW DAN COMMON LAW

This research analyzes the dissolution of a company as a consequence of criminal law within the framework of civil law and common law, by comparing the practice in England and Germany. The research aims to show the different approaches to company dissolution. In the UK, compulsory liquidation proceedings and administrative flexibility are prioritized to protect the interests of creditors, whereas in Germany, dissolution requires formal shareholder approval and strict administrative oversight. In addition, this study also explores the factors that influence dissolution decisions and the dispute resolution efforts that arise. Through normative research with a statutory and comparative approach, this study analyzes legal documents and regulations related to dissolution in the two selected countries. Secondary data was collected from the analysis and review of academic literature. The results show that corporate dissolution in the UK emphasizes flexibility through the Companies Act 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986, while Germany, under the Act on Limited Liability Companies Germany, follows a strict structural process. Both prioritize creditor protection, with the duration of liquidation being shorter in the UK than Germany, which requires a minimum of one year.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal Standing Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24269/ls.v8i3a.10530
Primary Topic
Legal Studies and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PEMBUBARAN KORPORASI: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA SISTEM HUKUM CIVIL LAW DAN COMMON LAW

Rugun Romaida Hutabarat, Arsha Medina Aryadi
Legal Standing Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Legal Studies and Policies
article

PEMBUBARAN KORPORASI: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF ANTARA SISTEM HUKUM CIVIL LAW DAN COMMON LAW

Rugun Romaida Hutabarat, Arsha Medina Aryadi
article en

Abstract

This research analyzes the dissolution of a company as a consequence of criminal law within the framework of civil law and common law, by comparing the practice in England and Germany. The research aims to show the different approaches to company dissolution. In the UK, compulsory liquidation proceedings and administrative flexibility are prioritized to protect the interests of creditors, whereas in Germany, dissolution requires formal shareholder approval and strict administrative oversight. In addition, this study also explores the factors that influence dissolution decisions and the dispute resolution efforts that arise. Through normative research with a statutory and comparative approach, this study analyzes legal documents and regulations related to dissolution in the two selected countries. Secondary data was collected from the analysis and review of academic literature. The results show that corporate dissolution in the UK emphasizes flexibility through the Companies Act 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986, while Germany, under the Act on Limited Liability Companies Germany, follows a strict structural process. Both prioritize creditor protection, with the duration of liquidation being shorter in the UK than Germany, which requires a minimum of one year.

Legal Standing Jurnal Ilmu HukumVol. 8(3a)
Tarumanagara University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Legal Studies and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.