Jurisprudential Trends in Justifying the Principles of the Idea of “Responsibility of Destruction”

The liability or risks that threatens the buyers results from the destruction of the thing sold after concluding the sales contract and before it is actually delivered to him. The principle of destruction is rooted on the basis of the general rules of impossility of implementation, because the obligation that is impossible to implement is the obligation whose implementation is due to a foreign cause, and it cannot be implemented. For the contracting parties, such as force majeure or a sudden accident, which causes the contrac to be terminated by force of law and the obligation of the other party is dropped. Determining the liability is intended to determine who bears the loss that is supposed to reasult from the lossdue to the impossibility of performance. The legal relationship does not end until the identity of the party who bears the consequences of the loss is determined.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v19i01.008
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jurisprudential Trends in Justifying the Principles of the Idea of “Responsibility of Destruction”

Faisal Adnan Abed Shiaa
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Jurisprudential Trends in Justifying the Principles of the Idea of “Responsibility of Destruction”

Faisal Adnan Abed Shiaa
article en

Abstract

The liability or risks that threatens the buyers results from the destruction of the thing sold after concluding the sales contract and before it is actually delivered to him. The principle of destruction is rooted on the basis of the general rules of impossility of implementation, because the obligation that is impossible to implement is the obligation whose implementation is due to a foreign cause, and it cannot be implemented. For the contracting parties, such as force majeure or a sudden accident, which causes the contrac to be terminated by force of law and the obligation of the other party is dropped. Determining the liability is intended to determine who bears the loss that is supposed to reasult from the lossdue to the impossibility of performance. The legal relationship does not end until the identity of the party who bears the consequences of the loss is determined.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIESVol. 19(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.