Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of Inorganic Refrigerants in Cascade LNG Liquefaction Systems: A Performance Metrics

The increasing demand for energy-efficient and environmentally friendly liquefied natural gas (LNG) production has led to the exploration of alternative refrigerants in cascade liquefaction systems. This study presents a comparative thermodynamic analysis of inorganic refrigerants in cascade liquefied natural gas (LNG) liquefaction systems, focusing on performance metrics. The research aims to evaluate the exergy losses, coefficient of performance (COP), energy requirements, and overall thermodynamic efficiency of various refrigerants, including Argon, Krypton, Xenon, Nitrogen, and the conventional C3MR (Propane Mixed Refrigerant). Results reveal significant variations in refrigerant performance. C3MR demonstrates the highest COP (4.25) but exhibits moderate exergy efficiency (63%) and high energy losses in compressors. Noble gases show contrasting trends: argon achieves exceptional exergy efficiency (83%) but poor COP (1.38), while xenon has low exergy efficiency (36%) but a competitive COP (2.99). Nitrogen incurs catastrophic exergy losses during depressurization (345,439 kJ/hr), highlighting operational challenges. The study underscores the need for component-specific refrigerant optimization and suggests hybrid systems combining C3MR’s heat transfer advantages with argon’s exergy efficiency. These findings advance LNG liquefaction technology by providing a nuanced framework for balancing thermodynamic performance, environmental impact, and operational feasibility

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemistry & its Applications
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47363/jcia/2025(4)142
Primary Topic
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of Inorganic Refrigerants in Cascade LNG Liquefaction Systems: A Performance Metrics

Chukwuka D Offodum
Journal of Chemistry & its Applications
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
article

Comparative Thermodynamic Analysis of Inorganic Refrigerants in Cascade LNG Liquefaction Systems: A Performance Metrics

Chukwuka D Offodum
article en

Abstract

The increasing demand for energy-efficient and environmentally friendly liquefied natural gas (LNG) production has led to the exploration of alternative refrigerants in cascade liquefaction systems. This study presents a comparative thermodynamic analysis of inorganic refrigerants in cascade liquefied natural gas (LNG) liquefaction systems, focusing on performance metrics. The research aims to evaluate the exergy losses, coefficient of performance (COP), energy requirements, and overall thermodynamic efficiency of various refrigerants, including Argon, Krypton, Xenon, Nitrogen, and the conventional C3MR (Propane Mixed Refrigerant). Results reveal significant variations in refrigerant performance. C3MR demonstrates the highest COP (4.25) but exhibits moderate exergy efficiency (63%) and high energy losses in compressors. Noble gases show contrasting trends: argon achieves exceptional exergy efficiency (83%) but poor COP (1.38), while xenon has low exergy efficiency (36%) but a competitive COP (2.99). Nitrogen incurs catastrophic exergy losses during depressurization (345,439 kJ/hr), highlighting operational challenges. The study underscores the need for component-specific refrigerant optimization and suggests hybrid systems combining C3MR’s heat transfer advantages with argon’s exergy efficiency. These findings advance LNG liquefaction technology by providing a nuanced framework for balancing thermodynamic performance, environmental impact, and operational feasibility

Journal of Chemistry & its Applications
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.