Retrospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Tanner–Whitehouse-Based Bone Age Assessment Algorithm Trained with a Deep Neural Network System

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To develop an automated deep learning-based bone age prediction model using the Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) method and evaluate its feasibility by comparing its performance with that of pediatric radiologists. <b>Methods</b>: The hand and wrist radiographs of 560 Korean children and adolescents (280 female, 280 male, mean age 9.43 ± 2.92 years) were evaluated using the TW3-based model and three pediatric radiologists. Images with bony destruction, congenital anomalies, or non-diagnostic quality were excluded. A commercialized AI solution built upon the Rotated Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) and EfficientNet-B0 was used. Bone age measurements from the model and radiologists were compared using the paired <i>t</i>-tests. Linear regression analysis was performed and the coefficient of determination (r²), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) were measured. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted and the proportion of bone age predictions within 0.6 years of the radiologists' assessments was calculated. <b>Results</b>: The TW3-based model demonstrated no significant differences between bone age measurements and radiologists, except for participants <6 and >13 years old (overall, <i>p</i> = 0.874; 6-8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.737; 8-9 years, <i>p</i> = 0.093; 9-10 years, <i>p</i> = 0.301; 10-11 years, <i>p</i> = 0.584; 11-13 years, <i>p</i> = 0.976; <6 or >13 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a strong linear correlation between the model prediction and radiologist assessments (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.977). The RMSE and MAE values of the model were 0.529 (95% CI, 0.482-0.575) and 0.388 (95% CI, 0.361-0.417) years. Overall, 82.3% of bone age model predictions were within 0.6 years of the radiologists' interpretation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Automated deep learning-based bone age assessment has the potential to reduce radiologists' workload and provide standardized measurements for clinical decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15080993
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Retrospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Tanner–Whitehouse-Based Bone Age Assessment Algorithm Trained with a Deep Neural Network System

Yeon Jin Cho, Jinwoo Hwang, Meesun Lee, Young Hun Choi et al.
2 citations
Diagnostics
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
2.33
article

Retrospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Tanner–Whitehouse-Based Bone Age Assessment Algorithm Trained with a Deep Neural Network System

Yeon Jin Cho, Jinwoo Hwang, Meesun Lee, Young Hun Choi, Jae Won Choi, Jung‐Eun Cheon, Seunghyun Lee, Jeong-Hoon Kim, Sung-Wha Hong, Seulbi Lee
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To develop an automated deep learning-based bone age prediction model using the Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) method and evaluate its feasibility by comparing its performance with that of pediatric radiologists. <b>Methods</b>: The hand and wrist radiographs of 560 Korean children and adolescents (280 female, 280 male, mean age 9.43 ± 2.92 years) were evaluated using the TW3-based model and three pediatric radiologists. Images with bony destruction, congenital anomalies, or non-diagnostic quality were excluded. A commercialized AI solution built upon the Rotated Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) and EfficientNet-B0 was used. Bone age measurements from the model and radiologists were compared using the paired <i>t</i>-tests. Linear regression analysis was performed and the coefficient of determination (r²), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) were measured. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted and the proportion of bone age predictions within 0.6 years of the radiologists' assessments was calculated. <b>Results</b>: The TW3-based model demonstrated no significant differences between bone age measurements and radiologists, except for participants <6 and >13 years old (overall, <i>p</i> = 0.874; 6-8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.737; 8-9 years, <i>p</i> = 0.093; 9-10 years, <i>p</i> = 0.301; 10-11 years, <i>p</i> = 0.584; 11-13 years, <i>p</i> = 0.976; <6 or >13 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a strong linear correlation between the model prediction and radiologist assessments (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.977). The RMSE and MAE values of the model were 0.529 (95% CI, 0.482-0.575) and 0.388 (95% CI, 0.361-0.417) years. Overall, 82.3% of bone age model predictions were within 0.6 years of the radiologists' interpretation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Automated deep learning-based bone age assessment has the potential to reduce radiologists' workload and provide standardized measurements for clinical decision making.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(8)
Seoul National University (KR), Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.