Retrospective Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a New Tanner–Whitehouse-Based Bone Age Assessment Algorithm Trained with a Deep Neural Network System
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: To develop an automated deep learning-based bone age prediction model using the Tanner-Whitehouse (TW3) method and evaluate its feasibility by comparing its performance with that of pediatric radiologists. <b>Methods</b>: The hand and wrist radiographs of 560 Korean children and adolescents (280 female, 280 male, mean age 9.43 ± 2.92 years) were evaluated using the TW3-based model and three pediatric radiologists. Images with bony destruction, congenital anomalies, or non-diagnostic quality were excluded. A commercialized AI solution built upon the Rotated Single Shot MultiBox Detector (SSD) and EfficientNet-B0 was used. Bone age measurements from the model and radiologists were compared using the paired <i>t</i>-tests. Linear regression analysis was performed and the coefficient of determination (r²), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) were measured. A Bland-Altman analysis was conducted and the proportion of bone age predictions within 0.6 years of the radiologists' assessments was calculated. <b>Results</b>: The TW3-based model demonstrated no significant differences between bone age measurements and radiologists, except for participants <6 and >13 years old (overall, <i>p</i> = 0.874; 6-8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.737; 8-9 years, <i>p</i> = 0.093; 9-10 years, <i>p</i> = 0.301; 10-11 years, <i>p</i> = 0.584; 11-13 years, <i>p</i> = 0.976; <6 or >13 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a strong linear correlation between the model prediction and radiologist assessments (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.977). The RMSE and MAE values of the model were 0.529 (95% CI, 0.482-0.575) and 0.388 (95% CI, 0.361-0.417) years. Overall, 82.3% of bone age model predictions were within 0.6 years of the radiologists' interpretation. <b>Conclusions</b>: Automated deep learning-based bone age assessment has the potential to reduce radiologists' workload and provide standardized measurements for clinical decision making.
Authors
- Yeon Jin Cho (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-3030)
- Jinwoo Hwang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5285-1128)
- Meesun Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-0018)
- Young Hun Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9062)
- Jae Won Choi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5937-7238)
- Jung‐Eun Cheon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1479-2064)
- Seunghyun Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-0640)
- Jeong-Hoon Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0402-2798)
- Sung-Wha Hong
- Seulbi Lee
Institutions
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Seoul National University Hospital (KR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Diagnostics
- Published
- 2025-04-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15080993
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.33