Unpacking heterogeneity: Executive function and reading development in U.S. multilingual children from kindergarten to third grade

This study investigated the heterogeneity in English reading developmental trajectories among U.S. multilingual learners (MLs; N = 2896) from kindergarten through third grade, focusing on how early executive functions (EFs) contribute to variations in reading trajectories. Using a nationally representative sample and person-centered approach, this study identified four distinct reading growth profiles, revealing the heterogeneous nature of MLs' reading development and highlighting varied pathways within this population. Findings indicate that working memory emerged as the strongest predictor of membership in higher reading proficiency trajectories, supporting both immediate and sustained gains, while inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility uniquely contributed to distinguishing higher- from lower-performing profiles. The findings suggest that understanding the diverse cognitive and linguistic needs of MLs is essential for supporting their reading development. This study underscores the importance of incorporating EF-focused approaches into early literacy instruction and offers insights into instructional practices in increasingly diverse classrooms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102690
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking heterogeneity: Executive function and reading development in U.S. multilingual children from kindergarten to third grade

Jackie Eunjung Relyea
1 citations
Learning and Individual Differences
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
article

Unpacking heterogeneity: Executive function and reading development in U.S. multilingual children from kindergarten to third grade

Jackie Eunjung Relyea
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the heterogeneity in English reading developmental trajectories among U.S. multilingual learners (MLs; N = 2896) from kindergarten through third grade, focusing on how early executive functions (EFs) contribute to variations in reading trajectories. Using a nationally representative sample and person-centered approach, this study identified four distinct reading growth profiles, revealing the heterogeneous nature of MLs' reading development and highlighting varied pathways within this population. Findings indicate that working memory emerged as the strongest predictor of membership in higher reading proficiency trajectories, supporting both immediate and sustained gains, while inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility uniquely contributed to distinguishing higher- from lower-performing profiles. The findings suggest that understanding the diverse cognitive and linguistic needs of MLs is essential for supporting their reading development. This study underscores the importance of incorporating EF-focused approaches into early literacy instruction and offers insights into instructional practices in increasingly diverse classrooms.

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 120
North Carolina State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Reading and Literacy Development
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking heterogeneity: Executive function and reading development in U.S. multilingual children from kindergarten to third grade — Jackie Eunjung Relyea · Learning and Individual Differences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS