A Study to Compare Laser Versus and Ultrasound for Subject with Lower Cross Syndrome

Introduction and Aim: A muscle imbalance mostly in the lower extremities is the cause of lower cross syndrome. Stiffness of the iliopsoas, adductor group, and soleus, rectus femoris, and fascia lata tensor were also included. A pressure biofeedback device is used to measure and treat the transverse abdominis muscle. This study is required due to the duration of daily routines and the absence of regular exercise among young people. This produces a muscle imbalance in this population, which increases low back discomfort. The condition can cause pain and discomfort, as well as damage a person’s posture and movement. According to this study, poor posture, prolonged sitting, and a range of other factors increase the risk of developing lower cross syndrome in young people. Objective: To analyse the effectiveness of laser therapy along with experimental group for lower cross syndrome. To analyse the effectiveness of ultrasound therapy along with conventional group for lower cross syndrome. Methods: Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 adults with lower cross syndrome had be chosen. They would be split into two groups at random using the lottery method. Conventional (n = 15) and experimental (n = 15) The experimental group had been treated by laser therapy with conventional exercise for lower cross syndrome, and the conventional group had been treated by ultrasound therapy with conventional exercise for lower cross syndrome. Result: The statistical examination of quantitative studies indicates a legal distinction between the two groups Conclusion: This research concludes that laser therapy with stretching is more effective than ultrasound therapy with stretching for lower back pain syndrome. Keywords: Lower cross syndrome, MMT, ultrasound therapy, laser therapy, stretching MQLBPD, Good Health and wellbeing.