Analysis of Performance Labelling Sentiment Between K-Means Indobert And Inset Lexicon-Based

Sentiment analysis, a natural language processing technique, plays a key role in identifying opinions or sentiments from textual data. Accurate sentiment labelling within a dataset significantly impacts the performance of sentiment analysis models. However, manual labelling can be time-consuming. Many researchers utilize lexicon-based methods for sentiment labelling, but lexicons are often limited in reflecting topic-specific nuances, potentially leading to inaccurate sentiment representation. This inaccuracy can negatively affect classification models. Inset Lexicon (Indonesia Sentiment Lexicon) provides a pre-weighted list of sentiment words for sentiment analysis in Indonesian. This study aims to explore the use of K-means clustering as an automatic sentiment labelling technique and compare it to the performance of Inset Lexicon. For K-means clustering, IndoBERT is employed as the embedding model. The objective of this research is to evaluate the accuracy of automatic sentiment labelling by comparing it with actual data to assess the performance of both methods. The experiment accuracy shows that K-means with IndoBert achieves 74.79%, higher than Inset Lexicon that achieves only 59.82%

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika)
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30645/jurasik.v10i1.849
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Performance Labelling Sentiment Between K-Means Indobert And Inset Lexicon-Based

Bagus Priambodo, Rama Dona Ariyatma
Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika)
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
article

Analysis of Performance Labelling Sentiment Between K-Means Indobert And Inset Lexicon-Based

Bagus Priambodo, Rama Dona Ariyatma
article en

Abstract

Sentiment analysis, a natural language processing technique, plays a key role in identifying opinions or sentiments from textual data. Accurate sentiment labelling within a dataset significantly impacts the performance of sentiment analysis models. However, manual labelling can be time-consuming. Many researchers utilize lexicon-based methods for sentiment labelling, but lexicons are often limited in reflecting topic-specific nuances, potentially leading to inaccurate sentiment representation. This inaccuracy can negatively affect classification models. Inset Lexicon (Indonesia Sentiment Lexicon) provides a pre-weighted list of sentiment words for sentiment analysis in Indonesian. This study aims to explore the use of K-means clustering as an automatic sentiment labelling technique and compare it to the performance of Inset Lexicon. For K-means clustering, IndoBERT is employed as the embedding model. The objective of this research is to evaluate the accuracy of automatic sentiment labelling by comparing it with actual data to assess the performance of both methods. The experiment accuracy shows that K-means with IndoBert achieves 74.79%, higher than Inset Lexicon that achieves only 59.82%

Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika)Vol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of Performance Labelling Sentiment Between K-Means Indobert And Inset Lexicon-Based — Bagus Priambodo, Rama Dona Ariyatma · Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS