Laser guide stars as comparison stars: correcting scintillation noise

ABSTRACT The Earth’s atmosphere severely limits ground-based high precision photometry. Whilst adaptive optics can be used to improve image resolution, intensity fluctuations due to scintillation and atmospheric transparency variations remain. Scintillation noise cannot typically be corrected with a comparison star as it is produced by high altitude turbulence, and therefore the range of angles over which it is correlated is very small. Comparison stars can be used to correct for atmospheric transparency variations, however, its shot noise, as well as differences in the airmass along the lines of sight for each star, add noise to the calibration. These noise sources significantly limits ground-based observations of time-varying astronomical sources such as exoplanet transits. We propose a new technique to correct for these effects by superimposing a sodium laser guide star (LGS) with a science target star, therefore creating an artificial photometric reference beacon that passes along the same line of sight. The measured LGS photometry can then be used to correct the intensity variations of the target star due to scintillation. Simulation results exploring this proposed technique are presented along with results from an on-sky test of this experiment conducted in La Palma, Spain, using a simple instrument to image the LGS and the target star light sources separately onto a single detector. On-sky tests were able to reduce the variance of the light curve for the target star on average by a factor of $2.8\pm 0.6$. This demonstrates the technique and we expect that higher correction could be achieved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf614
Primary Topic
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laser guide stars as comparison stars: correcting scintillation noise

Kathryn E Hartley, Felipe Pedreros Bustos, David R. Jenkins, Richard Wilson et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
article

Laser guide stars as comparison stars: correcting scintillation noise

Kathryn E Hartley, Felipe Pedreros Bustos, David R. Jenkins, Richard Wilson, Mauro Centrone, Domenico Bonaccini Calia, James Osborn
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Earth’s atmosphere severely limits ground-based high precision photometry. Whilst adaptive optics can be used to improve image resolution, intensity fluctuations due to scintillation and atmospheric transparency variations remain. Scintillation noise cannot typically be corrected with a comparison star as it is produced by high altitude turbulence, and therefore the range of angles over which it is correlated is very small. Comparison stars can be used to correct for atmospheric transparency variations, however, its shot noise, as well as differences in the airmass along the lines of sight for each star, add noise to the calibration. These noise sources significantly limits ground-based observations of time-varying astronomical sources such as exoplanet transits. We propose a new technique to correct for these effects by superimposing a sodium laser guide star (LGS) with a science target star, therefore creating an artificial photometric reference beacon that passes along the same line of sight. The measured LGS photometry can then be used to correct the intensity variations of the target star due to scintillation. Simulation results exploring this proposed technique are presented along with results from an on-sky test of this experiment conducted in La Palma, Spain, using a simple instrument to image the LGS and the target star light sources separately onto a single detector. On-sky tests were able to reduce the variance of the light curve for the target star on average by a factor of $2.8\pm 0.6$. This demonstrates the technique and we expect that higher correction could be achieved.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 539(3)
European Southern Observatory (DE), Durham University (GB), Astronomical Observatory of Rome (IT), European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL)
UK Research and Innovation
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.