Comparative analysis of preoperative MRI detection and clinical palpation examination in patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumor

This study aimed to investigate the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical palpation on the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors. Patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors were recruited (42 with tongue cancer, 30 with buccal cancer, and 25 with gingival cancer). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate for these three cancers were compared. The MRI sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate were 69.39 % 65.12 %, 62.96 %, 58.33 %, and 63.92 %, respectively. The clinical palpation sensitivity was 46.51 %, specificity was 74.07 %, accuracy was 61.86 %, positive predictive rate was 58.82 %, and negative predictive rate was 63.49 %. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate of the combined examination were 74.42 %, 75.93 %, 75.26 %, 69.57 %, and 80.39 %, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of clinical palpation and MRI ( P = 0.012). The sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive rate of MRI for tongue cancer patients were significantly higher than those of clinical palpation, while the specificity and positive predictive rate of MRI were significantly lower than those of clinical palpation ( P = 0.013). The specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate of MRI were significantly lower than those of clinical palpation ( P = 0.024), while those of gingival cancer patients reached 100 %, which was higher than that of clinical palpation ( P < 0.002). Clinical palpation significantly affected the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in buccal cancer patients, while MRI significantly affected the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis gingival cancer patients. These findings provide evidence for clinicians in selecting diagnostic approaches, MRI and clinical palpation. MRI is recommended for gingival and tongue cancers, while clinical palpation remains valuable for buccal cancer. Combined examination enhances early detection of lymph node metastasis, supporting tailored treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101506
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of preoperative MRI detection and clinical palpation examination in patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumor

Jian Chen
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Comparative analysis of preoperative MRI detection and clinical palpation examination in patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumor

Jian Chen
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical palpation on the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors. Patients with oral and maxillofacial malignant tumors were recruited (42 with tongue cancer, 30 with buccal cancer, and 25 with gingival cancer). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate for these three cancers were compared. The MRI sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate were 69.39 % 65.12 %, 62.96 %, 58.33 %, and 63.92 %, respectively. The clinical palpation sensitivity was 46.51 %, specificity was 74.07 %, accuracy was 61.86 %, positive predictive rate was 58.82 %, and negative predictive rate was 63.49 %. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate of the combined examination were 74.42 %, 75.93 %, 75.26 %, 69.57 %, and 80.39 %, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of clinical palpation and MRI ( P = 0.012). The sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive rate of MRI for tongue cancer patients were significantly higher than those of clinical palpation, while the specificity and positive predictive rate of MRI were significantly lower than those of clinical palpation ( P = 0.013). The specificity, accuracy, positive predictive rate, and negative predictive rate of MRI were significantly lower than those of clinical palpation ( P = 0.024), while those of gingival cancer patients reached 100 %, which was higher than that of clinical palpation ( P < 0.002). Clinical palpation significantly affected the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in buccal cancer patients, while MRI significantly affected the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis gingival cancer patients. These findings provide evidence for clinicians in selecting diagnostic approaches, MRI and clinical palpation. MRI is recommended for gingival and tongue cancers, while clinical palpation remains valuable for buccal cancer. Combined examination enhances early detection of lymph node metastasis, supporting tailored treatment strategies.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 18(2)
First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China (CN), University of South China (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.