Paying It Back: On Litigating First Peoples’ Stolen Wages in Victoria

The Stolen Wages practices refer to the policies and actions of Australian states and territories under so-called ‘protection legislation’ throughout the 19th and 20th centuries which withheld, mismanaged and underpaid First Peoples’ wages and entitlements. In Victoria, despite decades of advocacy and a considerable body of evidence of such practices, there have been no government attempts to provide redress for the Stolen Wages. This article analyses the potential liabilities of the Victorian Government for these historical wrongs, in light of recent legal developments and parallel claims in other jurisdictions, focusing in particular on claims under trust and fiduciary duties. We argue that despite significant hurdles and constraints facing claimants, Victoria is potentially liable for substantial sums for breaches of its duties to First Peoples. Our analysis of such liabilities, and the limitations of courts as an avenue for reparations, speaks directly to the current truth-telling and Treaty processes in Victoria.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53637/gwur2215
Primary Topic
Australian History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paying It Back: On Litigating First Peoples’ Stolen Wages in Victoria

Laura Griffin, James Marchant
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Australian History and Society
article

Paying It Back: On Litigating First Peoples’ Stolen Wages in Victoria

Laura Griffin, James Marchant
article en

Abstract

The Stolen Wages practices refer to the policies and actions of Australian states and territories under so-called ‘protection legislation’ throughout the 19th and 20th centuries which withheld, mismanaged and underpaid First Peoples’ wages and entitlements. In Victoria, despite decades of advocacy and a considerable body of evidence of such practices, there have been no government attempts to provide redress for the Stolen Wages. This article analyses the potential liabilities of the Victorian Government for these historical wrongs, in light of recent legal developments and parallel claims in other jurisdictions, focusing in particular on claims under trust and fiduciary duties. We argue that despite significant hurdles and constraints facing claimants, Victoria is potentially liable for substantial sums for breaches of its duties to First Peoples. Our analysis of such liabilities, and the limitations of courts as an avenue for reparations, speaks directly to the current truth-telling and Treaty processes in Victoria.

University of New South Wales Law JournalVol. 48(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Australian History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.