Choice in Super

Individual participants in the Australian superannuation system enjoy the opportunity to make a variety of different types of choices in relation to their contributions. This article maps the statutory and other rules that govern the way this occurs. It does so in order to highlight the extent and intricacy of the bricolage created by repeated government reforms of the various regulatory regimes. The granular fidelity of that description provides a foundation for addressing questions about the normative underpinnings of the system, such as how the provision of different types of choice advances the pursuit of efficiency and legitimacy goals to ameliorate the paternalism immanent in a mandatory system and how recent government initiatives fit into this contest between competing regulatory objectives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53637/mgmt9344
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Choice in Super

Scott Donald
University of New South Wales Law Journal
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Choice in Super

Scott Donald
article en

Abstract

Individual participants in the Australian superannuation system enjoy the opportunity to make a variety of different types of choices in relation to their contributions. This article maps the statutory and other rules that govern the way this occurs. It does so in order to highlight the extent and intricacy of the bricolage created by repeated government reforms of the various regulatory regimes. The granular fidelity of that description provides a foundation for addressing questions about the normative underpinnings of the system, such as how the provision of different types of choice advances the pursuit of efficiency and legitimacy goals to ameliorate the paternalism immanent in a mandatory system and how recent government initiatives fit into this contest between competing regulatory objectives.

University of New South Wales Law JournalVol. 48(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.