Clustering in geo-data science: Navigating uncertainty to select the most reliable method

• Introduced the pyClusterWise package for clustering evaluation in geo-data science. • Emphasized adapting clustering methods to minimize uncertainties. • Reviewed key clustering methods and metrics for mineral exploration. • Highlighted the impact of uncertainty reduction on decision-making. Clustering is a fundamental technique in unsupervised learning that groups data points based on their similarities, enabling the discovery of underlying structures and patterns without the need for labeled examples. In geo-data science, clustering plays a pivotal role in applications such as exploratory data analysis, geochemical anomaly detection, and dimensionality reduction for multivariate data analysis. Mineral exploration, in particular, involves various uncertainties that significantly affect decision-making processes. A key source of such uncertainties arises from the choice of clustering methods and their evaluation metrics. Among the widely used clustering methods, K-Means, K-Medoids, Silhouette and Hierarchical Clustering are prominent, with K-Means being a more popular choice in geosciences. Similarly, evaluation techniques such as Silhouette, Davies-Bouldin, Calinski-Harabasz, Elbow, and Bayesian Information Criterion are employed, with the Elbow method being a frequent favorite in geo-data science. However, questions remain regarding the efficiency and suitability of these methods in different contexts. Should we rely solely on K-Means and Elbow, or should we adopt a more case-specific approach, comparing uncertainties and selecting methods that minimize them? This research provides a critical review of clustering methods and evaluation metrics in geo-data science. By developing the pyClusterWise Python package and using illustrative examples, the importance of tailoring these adjustments to the data and selecting clustering techniques and evaluation metrics based on their associated uncertainties is demonstrated. By doing so, the aim is to reduce overall uncertainty and improve decision-making outcomes in mineral exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106591
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clustering in geo-data science: Navigating uncertainty to select the most reliable method

Behnam Sadeghi
12 citations
Ore Geology Reviews
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
29.77
article

Clustering in geo-data science: Navigating uncertainty to select the most reliable method

Behnam Sadeghi
article en
12 citations

Abstract

• Introduced the pyClusterWise package for clustering evaluation in geo-data science. • Emphasized adapting clustering methods to minimize uncertainties. • Reviewed key clustering methods and metrics for mineral exploration. • Highlighted the impact of uncertainty reduction on decision-making. Clustering is a fundamental technique in unsupervised learning that groups data points based on their similarities, enabling the discovery of underlying structures and patterns without the need for labeled examples. In geo-data science, clustering plays a pivotal role in applications such as exploratory data analysis, geochemical anomaly detection, and dimensionality reduction for multivariate data analysis. Mineral exploration, in particular, involves various uncertainties that significantly affect decision-making processes. A key source of such uncertainties arises from the choice of clustering methods and their evaluation metrics. Among the widely used clustering methods, K-Means, K-Medoids, Silhouette and Hierarchical Clustering are prominent, with K-Means being a more popular choice in geosciences. Similarly, evaluation techniques such as Silhouette, Davies-Bouldin, Calinski-Harabasz, Elbow, and Bayesian Information Criterion are employed, with the Elbow method being a frequent favorite in geo-data science. However, questions remain regarding the efficiency and suitability of these methods in different contexts. Should we rely solely on K-Means and Elbow, or should we adopt a more case-specific approach, comparing uncertainties and selecting methods that minimize them? This research provides a critical review of clustering methods and evaluation metrics in geo-data science. By developing the pyClusterWise Python package and using illustrative examples, the importance of tailoring these adjustments to the data and selecting clustering techniques and evaluation metrics based on their associated uncertainties is demonstrated. By doing so, the aim is to reduce overall uncertainty and improve decision-making outcomes in mineral exploration.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 181
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Mineral Resources (AU), Australian Resources Research Centre (AU), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
29.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.