Quantifying the effect of road design on urban road driving speed

Reducing driving speed is a key factor in improving road safety and combating noise emissions. As a result, an increasing number of cities worldwide are lowering speed limits on urban roads. However, main urban roads differ from residential streets in several ways, including their appearance, type of trips they accommodate, mix of vehicles and the presence of public transport. These differences limit the design options available for speed reduction. This paper examines the impact of continuous road design measures on drivers' preferred speed, safe speed and actual driving speed on urban main roads, as well as the psychological processes influencing these choices. A virtual reality (VR) study was conducted using a driving simulator. Participants drove through a series of main roads in VR with varying speed limits and road designs. Speed and lateral position were recorded; in a follow-up survey, participants stated their preferred - as well as the considered ‘safe’ - speed along different road designs. They were also asked about driving style, perceived complexity and safety of each treatment. Simulator results indicated that only specific road designs result in slightly lower driving speeds. Survey results revealed that certain measures influenced preferred and safe speed. Specifically, those with effectiveness linked to the presence or absence of other road users (cyclists, pedestrians, or other cars). Moreover, the study showed that perceived safety and complexity moderated the effectiveness of these road design measures. Overall, road design measures investigated in this study provided evidence on the impact of road design on driving behavior, but also demonstrated the need for further investigations to include dynamic human factors, as well as combinations of measures to achieve the goal of lower speeds on urban roads. • A VR driving simulator was used to study the impact of road design on chosen speed. • Complexity and risk perceptions influenced assessments of safe and preferred speed. • Continuous road design measures had only small effects on chosen speed. • Road designs with trees lowered driven speed; the presence of parking lowered preferred speed. • Combinations of human factors and multiple road design measures could be more effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2025.04.005
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the effect of road design on urban road driving speed

Alexander Erath, Nora Studer, Dorothea Schaffner, Michael A.B. van Eggermond
Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Quantifying the effect of road design on urban road driving speed

Alexander Erath, Nora Studer, Dorothea Schaffner, Michael A.B. van Eggermond
article en

Abstract

Reducing driving speed is a key factor in improving road safety and combating noise emissions. As a result, an increasing number of cities worldwide are lowering speed limits on urban roads. However, main urban roads differ from residential streets in several ways, including their appearance, type of trips they accommodate, mix of vehicles and the presence of public transport. These differences limit the design options available for speed reduction. This paper examines the impact of continuous road design measures on drivers' preferred speed, safe speed and actual driving speed on urban main roads, as well as the psychological processes influencing these choices. A virtual reality (VR) study was conducted using a driving simulator. Participants drove through a series of main roads in VR with varying speed limits and road designs. Speed and lateral position were recorded; in a follow-up survey, participants stated their preferred - as well as the considered ‘safe’ - speed along different road designs. They were also asked about driving style, perceived complexity and safety of each treatment. Simulator results indicated that only specific road designs result in slightly lower driving speeds. Survey results revealed that certain measures influenced preferred and safe speed. Specifically, those with effectiveness linked to the presence or absence of other road users (cyclists, pedestrians, or other cars). Moreover, the study showed that perceived safety and complexity moderated the effectiveness of these road design measures. Overall, road design measures investigated in this study provided evidence on the impact of road design on driving behavior, but also demonstrated the need for further investigations to include dynamic human factors, as well as combinations of measures to achieve the goal of lower speeds on urban roads. • A VR driving simulator was used to study the impact of road design on chosen speed. • Complexity and risk perceptions influenced assessments of safe and preferred speed. • Continuous road design measures had only small effects on chosen speed. • Road designs with trees lowered driven speed; the presence of parking lowered preferred speed. • Combinations of human factors and multiple road design measures could be more effective.

Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and BehaviourVol. 112
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.