A growth-theory-of-interest intervention helps align science students with a new multidisciplinary curriculum

• Well-intentioned curricula reforms may fail if students’ mindsets prevent them from embracing those beneficial changes • A growth-theory-of-interest intervention helped science-identified students adapt to their new multidisciplinary curriculum • Studentsin the intervention (vs. control) condition developed a stronger arts identity and greater sense of school belonging • By increasing school belonging, the intervention indirectly predicted higher year-end grade-point-average (GPA) What happens when well-intentioned changes to curricula clash with students’ pre-existing academic identity? In the present study, students entered a two-year pre-university school strongly identified with science but not arts—an identity that did not fit with their school’s new multidisciplinary curriculum that mandated engagement with both academic areas. We investigated the efficacy of a growth-theory-of-interest intervention (O’Keefe et al., 2023)—which promoted the view that academic interests are developed rather than inherent and fixed—in helping students reap the benefits of the new curriculum. We conducted a randomized controlled field experiment with incoming students who overwhelmingly identified as interested in science but not arts ( N = 151). Before matriculating, students were randomly assigned to complete the growth-theory-of-interest intervention or active-control materials. Approximately 7 months later, students in the intervention condition reported a stronger arts identity (without diminishing their science identity), and stronger fit and belonging in school, relative to the active control condition. Moreover, whereas developing a stronger arts identity was associated with lower belonging in the control condition, this drop was eliminated in the intervention condition. Finally, by improving students’ school belonging, the intervention indirectly predicted higher year-end GPAs. The results underscore the intervention’s efficacy in promoting a mindset conducive to multidisciplinary learning and facilitating students’ fit and belonging within a curriculum intended to enrich their educational experiences and future career prospects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102371
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A growth-theory-of-interest intervention helps align science students with a new multidisciplinary curriculum

S.M. Ramya, Paul A. O’Keefe, E. J. Horberg
1 citations
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
2.12
article

A growth-theory-of-interest intervention helps align science students with a new multidisciplinary curriculum

S.M. Ramya, Paul A. O’Keefe, E. J. Horberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Well-intentioned curricula reforms may fail if students’ mindsets prevent them from embracing those beneficial changes • A growth-theory-of-interest intervention helped science-identified students adapt to their new multidisciplinary curriculum • Studentsin the intervention (vs. control) condition developed a stronger arts identity and greater sense of school belonging • By increasing school belonging, the intervention indirectly predicted higher year-end grade-point-average (GPA) What happens when well-intentioned changes to curricula clash with students’ pre-existing academic identity? In the present study, students entered a two-year pre-university school strongly identified with science but not arts—an identity that did not fit with their school’s new multidisciplinary curriculum that mandated engagement with both academic areas. We investigated the efficacy of a growth-theory-of-interest intervention (O’Keefe et al., 2023)—which promoted the view that academic interests are developed rather than inherent and fixed—in helping students reap the benefits of the new curriculum. We conducted a randomized controlled field experiment with incoming students who overwhelmingly identified as interested in science but not arts ( N = 151). Before matriculating, students were randomly assigned to complete the growth-theory-of-interest intervention or active-control materials. Approximately 7 months later, students in the intervention condition reported a stronger arts identity (without diminishing their science identity), and stronger fit and belonging in school, relative to the active control condition. Moreover, whereas developing a stronger arts identity was associated with lower belonging in the control condition, this drop was eliminated in the intervention condition. Finally, by improving students’ school belonging, the intervention indirectly predicted higher year-end GPAs. The results underscore the intervention’s efficacy in promoting a mindset conducive to multidisciplinary learning and facilitating students’ fit and belonging within a curriculum intended to enrich their educational experiences and future career prospects.

Contemporary Educational PsychologyVol. 81
University of Exeter (GB), Jönköping University (SE)
Ministry of Education - Singapore
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.