A survey of diagnostic reference levels for head, chest, and abdomen and pelvis CT in private diagnostic facilities in Norway

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) scans account for 60% of the total radiation dose in medical imaging. Literature has shown that patient dose varies across CT scanners, diagnostic protocols, and technical parameters at each site, suggesting an opportunity for starting an optimization process through establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).PurposeTo establish local DRLs (LDRLs) for six Norwegian private diagnostic institutes for frequently performed CT protocols.Material and MethodsDose data from 900 patients were collected from six diagnostic facilities. Data were recorded from non-contrast CT scans of the head and contrast-enhanced scans of the thorax and abdomen and pelvis from average-sized adult patients. An ANOVA test was performed to determine the variation in dose between scanners. LDRLs were determined by the 75th percentile of median values from dose indicators of CT scanners.ResultsThe difference between the means of the dose distribution from each scanner was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0,05) for all examinations. The LDRLs determined were lower, for both national and international DRLs.ConclusionObserved dose variations from the scanners indicate a need for protocol optimization for some institutes, while the LDRLs demonstrate a potential for establishing newer national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) in Norway.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251330242
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A survey of diagnostic reference levels for head, chest, and abdomen and pelvis CT in private diagnostic facilities in Norway

Mercy Afadzi Tetteh, Safora Johansen, Frida Gravdahl Helgesen
Acta Radiologica
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

A survey of diagnostic reference levels for head, chest, and abdomen and pelvis CT in private diagnostic facilities in Norway

Mercy Afadzi Tetteh, Safora Johansen, Frida Gravdahl Helgesen
article en

Abstract

BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) scans account for 60% of the total radiation dose in medical imaging. Literature has shown that patient dose varies across CT scanners, diagnostic protocols, and technical parameters at each site, suggesting an opportunity for starting an optimization process through establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs).PurposeTo establish local DRLs (LDRLs) for six Norwegian private diagnostic institutes for frequently performed CT protocols.Material and MethodsDose data from 900 patients were collected from six diagnostic facilities. Data were recorded from non-contrast CT scans of the head and contrast-enhanced scans of the thorax and abdomen and pelvis from average-sized adult patients. An ANOVA test was performed to determine the variation in dose between scanners. LDRLs were determined by the 75th percentile of median values from dose indicators of CT scanners.ResultsThe difference between the means of the dose distribution from each scanner was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0,05) for all examinations. The LDRLs determined were lower, for both national and international DRLs.ConclusionObserved dose variations from the scanners indicate a need for protocol optimization for some institutes, while the LDRLs demonstrate a potential for establishing newer national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) in Norway.

Acta RadiologicaVol. 66(8)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Akershus University Hospital (NO), Unilabs (Norway) (NO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.