Random Forest model for precise cooling load estimation in optimized and non-optimized form

Abstract Energy is vital for life and human development, with global warming due to activities such as the combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation emitting dangerous greenhouse gases, changing the climate of the Earth. Global energy demand is increasing, with developed nations viewing buildings as major energy consumers. Due to the long lifespan of buildings, it is important to evaluate their suitability to future climate change and possible changes in energy consumption. Appraisal of the cooling loads in each building is now required due to rising energy costs and the need to reduce the impacts of climate change caused by energy consumption from fossil fuels in buildings. This paper aims to apply Random Forest Regression (RF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR), well-known machine learning algorithms to predict building cooling loads. It utilizes the Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO) and Transit Search Optimization Algorithm (TSOA) to enhance accuracy and minimize overall error in Cooling Load (CL) estimation. The investigation suggests two high-performance schemes, applies two optimizers for hybrid schemes, and utilizes an ensemble approach for accurate appraisal . Moreover, the SHAP method is utilized to compare the effectiveness of the parameters. The research proves to be insightful in constructing CL projection and suggests that a RFJS-based model is the most effective way to optimize energy consumption. The hybrid model attained an R 2 of 0.994 at its best and RMSE of 0.744. Other than this, the following effective ensemble approach was RSJS, whose R 2 and RMSE were 0.989 and 0.985, accordingly. The third best-performing model was SVJS with R 2 and RMSE values of 0.972 and 1.583, accordingly.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2024-0033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Random Forest model for precise cooling load estimation in optimized and non-optimized form

Qingqing Zhang, Lei Wang, Hongmei Gu
1 citations
Chemical Product and Process Modeling
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
article

Random Forest model for precise cooling load estimation in optimized and non-optimized form

Qingqing Zhang, Lei Wang, Hongmei Gu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Energy is vital for life and human development, with global warming due to activities such as the combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation emitting dangerous greenhouse gases, changing the climate of the Earth. Global energy demand is increasing, with developed nations viewing buildings as major energy consumers. Due to the long lifespan of buildings, it is important to evaluate their suitability to future climate change and possible changes in energy consumption. Appraisal of the cooling loads in each building is now required due to rising energy costs and the need to reduce the impacts of climate change caused by energy consumption from fossil fuels in buildings. This paper aims to apply Random Forest Regression (RF) and Support Vector Regression (SVR), well-known machine learning algorithms to predict building cooling loads. It utilizes the Jellyfish Search Optimizer (JSO) and Transit Search Optimization Algorithm (TSOA) to enhance accuracy and minimize overall error in Cooling Load (CL) estimation. The investigation suggests two high-performance schemes, applies two optimizers for hybrid schemes, and utilizes an ensemble approach for accurate appraisal . Moreover, the SHAP method is utilized to compare the effectiveness of the parameters. The research proves to be insightful in constructing CL projection and suggests that a RFJS-based model is the most effective way to optimize energy consumption. The hybrid model attained an R 2 of 0.994 at its best and RMSE of 0.744. Other than this, the following effective ensemble approach was RSJS, whose R 2 and RMSE were 0.989 and 0.985, accordingly. The third best-performing model was SVJS with R 2 and RMSE values of 0.972 and 1.583, accordingly.

Chemical Product and Process ModelingVol. 20(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Random Forest model for precise cooling load estimation in optimized and non-optimized form — Qingqing Zhang, Lei Wang, et al. · Chemical Product and Process Modeling (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS